Replies: 26
| visibility 1
|
Oculus Spirit [93152]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95152
Joined: 12/25/09
|
|
|
|
110%er [7110]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9293
Joined: 12/18/13
|
Re: Laugh and ridicule this guy,
Nov 28, 2020, 8:14 PM
|
|
Despite some guy speculating that hundreds of thousands of votes were switched, not a single vote had been found that actually was. Crazy how that works.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93152]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95152
Joined: 12/25/09
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7110]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9293
Joined: 12/18/13
|
Again
Nov 28, 2020, 10:40 PM
|
|
If any of that were actually true, it'd be pretty easy to find evidence and bring to court. This is why judges keep laughing at these internet site affidavits that don't actually bring forth specific accusations. Good luck though.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93152]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95152
Joined: 12/25/09
|
Some say these judges are political.
Nov 29, 2020, 12:19 AM
|
|
I don't think that's the case. Imo, they just don't want to get in the middle and be responsible for however this turns out. I'm not a pro at law and haven't spent much time with judges. Maybe if someone here is familiar with the average judge he might have a more informed speculation.
I'm not saying they are playing politics, just that I'm not one to presume any position above my experience or station in life.
Ask Spooneye or one of our other lawdog friend.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34054]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33570
Joined: 9/13/99
|
OK, let's start with misspelling the first word.
Nov 28, 2020, 10:32 PM
|
|
It's spelled "Declaration."
The rest is a bunch of stuff that doesn't add up to a court reversing a presidential election.
Laughing and ridiculing complete. Next!
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93152]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95152
Joined: 12/25/09
|
It's become obvious to everyone you need a good...
Nov 29, 2020, 12:15 AM
|
|
worming and I have just the solution to fix what ails you. Must I continue sleeping on the couch?
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [52]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34054]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33570
Joined: 9/13/99
|
Re: OK, let's start with misspelling the first word.
Nov 29, 2020, 11:39 AM
|
|
No one is trying to keep transparency to a minimum. Transparency doesn't mean allowing nonsense to proceed in the courts.
When the Court dismisses this case, I'll post it here.
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [52]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: OK, let's start with misspelling the first word.
Nov 29, 2020, 12:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34054]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33570
Joined: 9/13/99
|
Re: OK, let's start with misspelling the first word.
Nov 29, 2020, 1:09 PM
|
|
If you name a case opposed by Democrats, I'll explain why their opposition is not anti-transparency.
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [52]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: OK, let's start with misspelling the first word.
Nov 29, 2020, 2:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93152]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95152
Joined: 12/25/09
|
First off,
Nov 29, 2020, 3:15 PM
|
|
I do not believe the average voter who cast a vote for Biden or any other democrat would take part in what is alleged 'the democratic party,' is doing.
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [52]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [41716]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 37936
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Remember...
Nov 30, 2020, 8:08 AM
|
|
If you don't respond to T3 right away, you have no life, but if you respond to him immediately, you also have no life.
#T3logic
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34054]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33570
Joined: 9/13/99
|
Re: OK, let's start with misspelling the first word.
Nov 29, 2020, 6:52 PM
[ in reply to Re: OK, let's start with misspelling the first word. ] |
|
OK, if I might borrow a question from you: Are you a frakking idiot or just dishonest?
I'm just kidding. I don't think you're either one. But I did address this multiple times before, yet you keep repeating it.
The Board of Elections never defied the court's order because the order was directed to the lower court, not to the board of elections. And the order never got anywhere because jurisdiction was placed with the Pa. Supreme Court immediately afterwards.
In short, there was no order for the board of elections to defy. The order you're talking about never took effect.
And, as you know, there is no right in Pennsylvania for observers to be within 6 feet. The Commonwealth Court legislated from the bench with that decision, and got reversed for it.
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [52]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: OK, let's start with misspelling the first word.
Nov 29, 2020, 6:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34054]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33570
Joined: 9/13/99
|
Re: OK, let's start with misspelling the first word.
Nov 29, 2020, 7:14 PM
|
|
If I may:
Okay what about the case where Trump won the right to have observers within 6 ft. The board of elections defied the court order and appealed it
That's what you said. That's false. They did not defy the order. There was NO ORDER for the board of elections to do anything.
So THAT'S what you just said. And it's still false. It will be false the next time you say it.
I don't agree that letting partisan observers (who care less about accuracy and more about their guy winning) get overly close to ballot counters is the best way to ensure transparency. I think it's the best way to allow shenanigans. Check out what partisans did in the 2000 election, beating down doors to try to prevent ballots from being counted (the roles were switched back then, with Gore wanting to continue the recount). The LAST thing I want is Trumpers (or, for that matter, Biden...ers) getting too close to the officials.
That's my 100% honest opinion. And I'll add that I'm not an election law expert, and I don't know the full process of how votes in various states are counted and what improvements to oversight can be made, but I'm in favor of considering and passing such laws. So that's my olive branch to you on that issue.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [41716]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 37936
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: OK, let's start with misspelling the first word.
Nov 30, 2020, 8:19 AM
|
|
That's what you said. That's false. They did not defy the order. There was NO ORDER for the board of elections to do anything.
Haven't you proved this about a dozen times with T3 and he still keeps stating otherwise?
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34054]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33570
Joined: 9/13/99
|
Re: OK, let's start with misspelling the first word.
Nov 30, 2020, 9:57 AM
|
|
Yes, I believe so.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93152]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95152
Joined: 12/25/09
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34054]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33570
Joined: 9/13/99
|
We need to clarify something.
Nov 30, 2020, 3:06 PM
|
|
The observers that we're talking about are in the canvassing (ballot-counting) locations, not the polling places. The part of the code you're referring to is not the part that deals with opening mail-in ballots. This was addressed in one of the opinions.
Here's what the code allows:
The 2019 amendments to the Election Code expressly specify that one authorized representative for each candidate and one authorized representative for each political party must be permitted to remain in the room at the county election board where the pre-canvass and canvass meetings occur.
Authorized representatives are permitted to be present when envelopes containing official absentee ballots and mail-in ballots are opened and when such ballots are counted and recorded. This includes both the pre-canvass and canvass.
Authorized representatives (which includes poll watchers that have been designated by a candidate or political party to serve as authorized representatives during the pre-canvass or canvass) may not challenge an absentee or mail-in ballot during the pre-canvass or canvass of the ballots. Absentee and mail-in ballot applications may only be challenged prior to 5:00 pm on the Friday prior to the election, and only on good faith grounds that the applicant was not a qualified elector. No other challenges are permitted. Authorized representatives may not engage in, attempt to intimidate, nor interfere with the pre-canvass or canvass of the absentee and mail-in ballots. Challenges to mail-in or absentee ballots, based on signature analysis, are not permitted at any time.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4365]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 8370
Joined: 1/4/17
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [52]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: OK, let's start with misspelling the first word.
Nov 29, 2020, 9:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93152]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95152
Joined: 12/25/09
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 49059
Joined: 5/16/04
|
Re: Laugh and ridicule this guy,
Nov 29, 2020, 12:01 PM
|
|
I think you are showing what TDS really is. He is gone, man. Let it go. I know your love was deep, but he doesn't want you anymore. You will find somebody new. Stay strong.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16031]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12700
Joined: 11/14/09
|
Nobody, but nobody, expected the loyal Ever Trumper flock
Nov 29, 2020, 12:03 PM
|
|
of sheep and its chief con artist to not go into full on anti-Democratic sore looser mode following a crushing general and electoral college loss at the polls. Nobody.
Carry on.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 26
| visibility 1
|
|
|