Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Wow. UNC sure got a raw deal by the refs...
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 11
| visibility 2,371

Wow. UNC sure got a raw deal by the refs...


Dec 6, 2015, 9:21 AM

Couldn't have happened to a better bunch. :) Go Tigers!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I worried myself sick about it last night for at least a


Dec 6, 2015, 9:22 AM

minute.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow. UNC sure got a raw deal by the refs...


Dec 6, 2015, 9:25 AM

I respectfully disagree. In spite of the offsides call (should it have been illegal formation? watch the vid), the refs missed a LOT of calls against Tarheels...

- targeting on Watson
- targeting on the first onsides kick
- holding call late in the 4th Q in the red zone when UNC was making a dash for the end zone and our guy was in perfect position to stop him

If anything, TarHoles got off easy last night

But you are right about one thing...."it couldn't have happened to nicer people!"

My daughter was accepted to UNC. I told her I would proud of her if she worked her way through college at Chapel Hell.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Please thump your sarcasm meter...***


Dec 6, 2015, 9:27 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If being lined up wrong for a kick is raw***


Dec 6, 2015, 9:26 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson


No it was the right call, El Swann posted the rule from the


Dec 6, 2015, 9:26 AM

rule book. When the play is set the coverage guys have to be behind the 9 yard mark. UNC had 3 or 4 players lined past the 9 yard mark.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: No it was the right call, El Swann posted the rule from the


Dec 6, 2015, 10:42 AM

So basically while that prik Fedora was bitching last night at the post game presser about having to "swallow it like a man" in reality the schmuck was pissed about not being able to pull a fast one ! What a pretentious entitled azzhole!Tell me this, at least for now do you really hate SCAR more than these UNC "##### and moan" cheaters?If the situation was reversed they wouldn't give a rats ### about it!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We had some bad calls too. Besides,


Dec 6, 2015, 9:27 AM

we would have stopped them anyway. We don't lose!!!!

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

like those idiots that think if ND makes the 2pt. conversion they win. ***


Dec 6, 2015, 9:40 AM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Anybody that says Coach Brownell is the best coach to come through Clemson is going to start an argument." -JP Hall


Poor attempt at sarcasm. Sorry.***


Dec 6, 2015, 9:28 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow. UNC sure got a raw deal by the refs...


Dec 6, 2015, 9:38 AM

What no one is talking about is the interception that wasn't.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I agree. The ground assisted the catch. Another bad call


Dec 6, 2015, 10:01 AM

.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson Football, the glory days are here!


Replies: 11
| visibility 2,371
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...136 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic