CLEMSON FOOTBALL

Final grades: After strong start, Clemson tight end group has mixed results
Allen was periodically a threat downfield and a solid run-blocker.

Final grades: After strong start, Clemson tight end group has mixed results


by -

We continue our look at the Tigers’ season position-by-position with the tight ends:

2020 final TE depth chart (snaps/final PFF grade)

TE: Braden Galloway - 6-4 240 jr. (463/58.8)

Davis Allen - 6-6 250 so. (350/71)

J.C. Chalk - 6-3 255 sr. (123/54.5)

Other scholarship TEs (played in at least one game): Jaelyn Lay - 6-6 270 r-fr. (76/48.9); Sage Ennis - 6-4 235 fr. (27/42.9)

Stat leaders

Receiving yards: 1. Galloway (369) 2. Allen (247) 3. Chalk (43)

TD receptions: 1. Allen (4) 2. Galloway (2) 3. Chalk (1)

Receptions: 1. Galloway (27) 2. Allen (16) 3. Chalk (6)

Misc: Yards per reception - Allen (15.4).

TigerNet Take

David Hood: A lot has been made about the production from the tight end spot this past season. Or, if I may, the perceived lack of production. Braden Galloway was fourth on the team in receiving with his 27 receptions and Davis Allen was seventh with 16 catches. That’s a huge improvement from 2019 when JC Chalk led all tight ends with just 13 catches. In Clemson’s 2018 National Championship season, no tight end had more catches than Milan Richard, who wound up with just six.

However, last year’s production was still a far cry from 2016 (Jordan Leggett, 46 catches), 2015 (Leggett, 40), 2012 (Brandon Ford, 40), 2011 (Dwayne Allen, 49), and 2009 (Michael Palmer, 43). Of course, this year’s tight end group had to block more than anyone would like because the offensive line struggled at times. Galloway and Davis are a great tandem and hopefully will flourish under Tony Elliott, who is replacing Danny Pearman as the position coach. Jaelyn Lay is a physical specimen but hasn’t impressed enough to see the field and has just two receptions in two years for a grand total of 20 yards.

The Tigers add Jake Briningstool, the nation’s top-ranked tight end prospect for the 2021 recruiting cycle, into the mix for 2021. That makes for a crowded yet competitive room, and with a new voice, hopefully a more productive room from a receiving standpoint.

Brandon Rink: The start of the season seemed to indicate a shift in the tight end’s role in the offense, and like David noted, there was improvement from recent years -- it just didn’t end up being a significant part of the offense.

Chalk caught the first touchdown pass of the season and tight ends saw eight targets with seven catches for 114 yards in the opener against Wake Forest. While that was a lofty start, the tight end group then averaged 3.9 catches for 40 yards with six total TDs over the remaining games and made up 13 percent of the total receiving yards (up from five percent in 2019 and 3.3 percent in 2018, however).

In run-blocking, PFF gave Allen the edge among regular players (63.9), outgrading two starting linemen, and quite a bit ahead of Galloway (51). Allen also got the nod as a receiver (70.7-60.5).

Overall, I’d say the needle is pointing up for the group and will improve with the addition of Briningstool and possibly Ennis working his way in after a full year on campus. With Elliott taking over position coaching here, it'll be interesting to track what might happen under the former Tigers receiver.

TigerNet grade: C+

Final grades: Defensive end

Final grades: Defensive tackle

Final grades: Linebackers

Final grades: Safeties

Final grades: Cornerbacks

Final grades: Offensive line

Final grades: Quarterback

Ultimate Level LogoUpgrade Your Account

Unlock premium boards and exclusive features (e.g. ad-free) by upgrading your account today.

Upgrade Now
Comment on this story
Print   
Send Feedback to TigerNet Staff: Email | Comment
Clemson guard enters name in NBA draft
Clemson guard enters name in NBA draft
Clemson men's basketball lands transfer
Clemson men's basketball lands transfer
McCubbin throws shutout, No. 20 Tigers down Eagles in home finale
McCubbin throws shutout, No. 20 Tigers down Eagles in home finale
No. 4 Tigers top 49ers
No. 4 Tigers top 49ers
Post your comments!