Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Watched a Dateline on the LDS church last night
General Boards - Religion & Philosophy
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next
Replies: 42
| visibility 351

Watched a Dateline on the LDS church last night

3

Apr 13, 2024, 9:00 AM
Reply

I believe I now owe echoes sort of an apology.

Your presentation with these things is terrible but there does seem to be people who use some of these Bible verses to justify polygamy, force women into marriage and even sexually assault them.

Sadly, they use the same version of the Bible that I was raised to believe was the best version and it got me thinking...

Does the support of the belief that these religious texts, not just the Bible, are god's word enable these people who use them to justify abuse?

It seems harmless enough to me to believe the basic tenets of love and salvation, but when you dig deeper there do seem to be some things that it can be used to support that are wrong.

The KKK used it to justify racism. LDS uses it to justify sexual assault. Radical Muslims use it to justify killing in the name of their god, and the Christian crusades did the same thing.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Watched a Dateline on the LDS church last night

2

Apr 13, 2024, 9:23 AM
Reply

No need to apologize to me but I appreciate the sentiment.

I will say, while some do not like my “presentation” the data show that i get a high thumbs up rate and tigerpulse. Clearly most people on here don’t have THAT much of a problem with it. Im just a loud mouth.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Watched a Dateline on the LDS church last night

1

Apr 13, 2024, 9:37 AM
Reply

You just seem very snarky with your replies.

People don’t TD nearly as much on the politics and religion boards.

I have a handful of posters that TD everything I post on the main board but I think it’s hilarious.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Watched a Dateline on the LDS church last night

1

Apr 13, 2024, 9:50 AM
Reply

You’re not wrong

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Watched a Dateline on the LDS church last night


Apr 13, 2024, 2:20 PM
Reply

>there do seem to be some things that it can be used to support that are wrong.


There seems to be a long, running battle in the Bible itself between "letter" and "intent."

Typically, it takes the form of Kings or High Priests, naturally, siding with the letter of law. And prophets telling them they are wrong and missing the intent of the law.


Long before Jesus said this in the NT: Luke 6:31 "Do to others as you would have them do to you."

Zechariah was saying this in the OT: 7:9 “This is what the Lord Almighty said: ‘Administer true justice; show mercy and compassion to one another.


It's the same general idea as the debate between oral tradition and written tradition and between Pharisees and Sadducees. One kind of needs both, and needs to know when to apply both.

2024 free_orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Watched a Dateline on the LDS church last night

1

Apr 13, 2024, 2:33 PM
Reply

“ Zechariah was saying this in the OT: 7:9 “This is what the Lord Almighty said: ‘Administer true justice; show mercy and compassion to one another.”

That’s interesting and the verse that echoes kept ignoring says basically the same thing.

Leviticus 19: 33-34

Do not mistreat foreigners living in your country, but treat them just as you treat your own citizens. Love foreigners as you love yourselves, because you were foreigners one time in Egypt.

Maybe the Bible is from god but the only thing that matters is loving your neighbor. Everything else is human addition…

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Watched a Dateline on the LDS church last night

2

Apr 13, 2024, 2:50 PM
Reply

That's the thing though, I'm not ignoring the other text, I completely agree the bible has some great messages.

Just because it says to be nice in some messages doesn't mean I'm supposed to ignore the ones that aren't. The bible doesn't have to be harmonious, that is a requirement for a fundamentalist/apologist, not someone just reading the text as is.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Watched a Dateline on the LDS church last night

1

Apr 13, 2024, 3:22 PM
Reply

Agreed but the verses in question were a few passages apart. Not like one was from Old Testament and the other the New.

The same writer wrote both.

We can either assume he was ignorant and everybody else who had a part in the translation and canonization of the Old Testament was too, or that he had some kind of deeper meaning where both passages could simultaneously be true at least to him and his audience.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Watched a Dateline on the LDS church last night

2

Apr 13, 2024, 3:49 PM
Reply

>We can either assume he was ignorant and everybody else who had a part in the translation and canonization of the Old Testament was too, or that he had some kind of deeper meaning where both passages could simultaneously be true at least to him and his audience.

Why can't I just disagree with them? I don't have to think he's ignorant. He probably thought both things were true/moral. I don't think he or the others at the time thought otherwise.

I don't think anyone on this board is ignorant for believing, I just think they are wrong or have poor epistemologies, that's a big difference.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Christians haven't been on a crusade since...

1

Apr 13, 2024, 3:27 PM
Reply

the English translation which allowed anyone who could read access to God's Word. The church was in bed with the government and every action by the government was holy while the priest got away with murder.

No matter how good it is man can screw it up. I have heard people use one verse or two verses and totally miss the point of both verses due to lack of context.

Imagine if two people talked about a book, say, Dune, and neither of them had read it.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Christians haven't been on a crusade since...

1

Apr 13, 2024, 3:50 PM
Reply

>Imagine if two people talked about a book, say, Dune, and neither of them had read it.

ok but the issue here isn't that people haven't read it. It's literally because we've read that we see the problems.

Go to church, you'd be shocked at the biblical illiteracy.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Christians haven't been on a crusade since...


Apr 13, 2024, 9:44 PM
Reply

One thing that never shocks me is the way people in church, and not part of the church, continually take scripture out on context to validate their point.

badge-donor-10yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

John 3:16; 14:1-6


Re: Christians haven't been on a crusade since...

1

Apr 13, 2024, 9:50 PM
Reply

It says whatever you want it to say, that’s why there are so many denominations and infighting.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Christians haven't been on a crusade since...

1

Apr 14, 2024, 8:34 AM
Reply

So, you agree with me. Imagine that!

Exegesis vs Eisegesis

badge-donor-10yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

John 3:16; 14:1-6


Re: Christians haven't been on a crusade since...

1

Apr 14, 2024, 8:58 AM
Reply

We probably agree on most things ;)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Alot of churches use scripture as a weapon to keep women down....


Apr 14, 2024, 8:42 AM
Reply

I think they're mis-reading scripture either mistakenly or on purpose to keep women as second class citizens in their own church. It's sad to see this in 2024.

To me, that's the next big reformation that is needed in Christianity.

I would say the same thing applies to gay people, but there's certainly discrimination again women because of a couple of things Paul wrote that is being improperly applied to cut 50% of humanity out of leadership in various denominations around the world.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Alot of churches use scripture as a weapon to keep women down....


Apr 14, 2024, 9:13 AM
Reply

Or maybe we should stop using a book written in a totally different culture and context to make decisions about what we do in 2024.

It’s a such a simple question that never gets a good answer….

Why does it hold so much authority?

It’s certainly not because Jesus, whom the Christian faith is SUPPOSED to be based, on said this or that. Most of the things the church is split over he never even touched on.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Jesus upset the social order, particularly with women....


Apr 14, 2024, 9:21 AM
Reply

If you follow what Jesus taught & said, women should be preachers. He appeared first to the women and sent them out to spread the news. The Book of Acts said that your sons and daughters would prophesy. This is clearly allowing women to preach and lead.

Alot of churches are built - unfortunately - around what their members want to exclude or hate. It's the human condition to stay within your tribe, and accept the "social order". Too many Christian churches are doing this, and they use the Bible to justify their discrimination. It's sinful, but it's widespread.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Jesus upset the social order, particularly with women....


Apr 14, 2024, 10:03 AM
Reply

I mean, it says both things, it happens a lot in the bible. Furthermore, when Paul suddenly seems misogynistic, it only appears in the pseudepigrapha. It seems to me that someone had an agenda and put Paul's name on it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Some of the scripture that was attributed to Paul likely wasn't written by Paul.


Apr 14, 2024, 10:35 AM
Reply

When you interpret the Bible, you have to use reason & you have to pay attention to context. "Paul" was not the final word on whether all women forever should or shouldn't be preachers. The rest of the Bible dispenses with that view in many passages, and Jesus himself modeled how we should look at women, as he completely upset the social order related to women.

But here we are 2000 years later, and we still have numerous Christian denominations & churches that exclude women from leadership. It's immoral, and it should be confronted.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Some of the scripture that was attributed to Paul likely wasn't written by Paul.


Apr 14, 2024, 10:39 AM
Reply

Are you saying that Paul says something different from the rest of the Bible?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm saying women should be allowed to be leaders in the Church.***


Apr 14, 2024, 10:46 AM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I'm saying women should be allowed to be leaders in the Church.***


Apr 14, 2024, 10:47 AM
Reply

I'm asking a specific question: Is what Paul says in agreement with the rest of the bible or not?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I've already said what I think....


Apr 14, 2024, 10:51 AM
Reply

Do you agree with me or not? Women should be allowed to be in leadership in the church.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I've already said what I think....


Apr 14, 2024, 10:56 AM
Reply

I'm curious why you won't answer the question as asked.

Does paul contradict the rest of the bible?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Do you agree with me that women should be included in church leadership?


Apr 14, 2024, 10:57 AM
Reply

Why won't you answer me?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Do you agree with me that women should be included in church leadership?


Apr 14, 2024, 11:02 AM
Reply

For one, I asked a question first. You are just dodging the quest, I know why, but it's strange.

You aren't saying "no", Paul does not contradict the rest of the bible, so I know your answer.

I will answer you: I'm not religious, I don't think the bible has any authority over women or anyone else. I'm generally in favor of inclusion, with some caveats. We can talk about those, but to me, that's completely orthogonal to the conversation.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thank you....


Apr 14, 2024, 11:07 AM
Reply

I don't think "Paul" was establishing a global church doctrine. He was talking about a specific church and his own view on that. In other parts of the New Testament, Paul acknowledges women who are spreading the word and who prophesy. So, I think understood in the right context, Paul is not going against the rest of the bible. Jesus dispensed with the notion that women couldn't lead. That's my view.

I'll take your answer, I guess, as an agreement with me that women should be allowed to lead in the church.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Thank you....


Apr 14, 2024, 11:09 AM
Reply

>I'll take your answer, I guess, as an agreement with me that women should be allowed to lead in the church.

Sure, I never said otherwise.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And I answered your question.****


Apr 14, 2024, 11:10 AM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: And I answered your question.****


Apr 14, 2024, 11:23 AM
Reply

You want your cake and to eat it too.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

A question...


Apr 14, 2024, 3:34 PM [ in reply to Some of the scripture that was attributed to Paul likely wasn't written by Paul. ]
Reply

What do you mean Jesus "completely upset the social order related to women?"

You also alluded earlier that in the last days there will be women that prophesize. How is that different than before Jesus came? Do you know who Anna was?

I am really curious what you use to support your claim that Jesus upset the social order of things to substantiate there should be women Leaders in the church. Certainly, women had a prominent role in His life and ministry. A supporting role, never a teaching role. Why, Jesus Himself did not select a woman to be an Apostle either. Now, don't think it was too early for such a move, if it was going to happen. They were already women prophets.

I am aware of the debate over Phoebe, a "deaconess" sent by Paul. Of course, the word used to call her a deaconess is the word for "servant", which is what a deacon is. But, why should the word "servant" be emphasized to mean anything more than a servant? Are the Deacons the "Board of Directors" for your church? Overruling the Pastor as they see fit?

Paul is also the one that gives direction on how to select a deacon for church service. Of particular note: "...Likewise, their wives must be reverent, not slanderers, temperate, faithful in all things. 12 Let deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well." (1 Ti 3:11–12). (1982).

Curiously awaiting your response.

badge-donor-10yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

John 3:16; 14:1-6


He upset a lot of social orders, not just women:


Apr 14, 2024, 4:27 PM
Reply

During the time of Jesus, women held a low place in society. Yet Jesus broke these social norms by speaking with women (Luke 7:11-17), healing women(Luke 8:43-48 and 3:12) and even elevating women by referring to them as “daughters of Abraham”(Luke 13:16). Breaking from the traditions of His day that rabbis did not teach women, Jesus taught women (Luke 10:38-42) and included women as disciples.(Matthew 12:46-50) In the story of the Samaritan woman at the well (John 4) and Martha at the tomb of Lazarus (John 11:25) , it was clear that women received Jesus’ self-revelation. Jesus broke the cultural barriers of gender and recognized women.

https://www.whwomenclergy.org/an-analysis-of-paul-s-position-on-women-in-ministry

Jesus never regarded women as inferior to men. To the contrary, He scandalized his own disciples by spending a lunch hour talking to one lone Samaritan woman—a disreputable woman at that! Yet through her witness Samaria was opened up to the ministry of Jesus, and later a revival under the preaching of Philip, Peter and John. He broke with Rabbinic tradition when he not only permitted Mary to hear the Word but defended her when Martha complained that she was not fulfilling her proper domestic role in the kitchen. Jesus replied, "Mary has chosen the good part, which shall not be taken away from her" (Luke 10:38–42). In so doing, Jesus affirmed the right of women to hear God's Word!

Nowhere is Jesus' concern for women more powerfully portrayed than in his strong and uncompromising teaching on divorce. In the Sermon on the Mount Jesus states: ". . . but I say unto you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for the cause of unchastity, makes her commit adultery" (Matt. 5:32). How so? In that culture, what was an uneducated unskilled woman to do to support herself when turned out of house and home? There were only two viable options open to her: one was to sell herself into prostitution, and the other was to bind herself into someone else's household as a bond-slave. This inevitably led to adultery since the master had absolute rights over the bodies of his female servants. So, in challenging the injustice of divorce, Jesus was striking a mighty blow on behalf of women's rights. Women were not to be used, abused, and cast aside. Women were not to be treated as slaves.

In the case of the woman taken in adultery (John 8:1–11), Jesus set himself against not only the male chauvinists of his day but the law of Moses itself. The law called for the stoning of both the man and the woman who were caught in an adulterous act (Lev. 20:10; Deut. 22:22f.). That only the woman was apprehended indicates the double standard operative in Jesus' day. By saving the woman's life, Jesus laid down the radically new principle that women were more important than even the Mosaic law!

................................................................................

We conclude, therefore, that Paul would be appalled at the discrimination which has dominated the Church since then. To withhold certain offices and functions from women institutionalizes divisiveness in the body based on no higher principle than that of physical gender. This is only a beginning and partial survey of all that Paul had to say about women. Yet if we were to examine the rest of his writings, excluding I Cor. 14:34–35 and I Tim. 2:5–11, they would be consistent with what we have discovered to this point.

We can summarize the Apostle's position regarding women as follows: First, men and women are created equally in the image and glory of God and participate equally in the grace of redemption. Second, marriage relationships are not to be ordered according to an externally imposed hierarchy "according to the law," but by an internally embraced expression of self-giving love through mutual submission. Third, women have just as much right as men to exercise their spiritual gifts in the Church and fulfill their ministry, especially if they are called to preach. The wholeness and the health of the Church depends upon the freedom of each individual to exercise his or her spiritual gift and calling to the fullest.

All that we have seen thus far leads us to affirm that Paul's attitude toward women is best set forward in his strong Declaration of Spiritual Emancipation: "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. . . . It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore, keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery" (Gal. 3:28; 5:1).
...............................................................................................

Any church that doesn't allow women to preach is sinning against women and God.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: He upset a lot of social orders, not just women:


Apr 14, 2024, 4:51 PM
Reply

Well, I'm certainly glad you didn't say it is a "Heaven of Hell" issue.

Added:

An afterthought when contemplating your last sentence. All sin is against God, as He is the giver of moral absolutes, and the standard by which moral failures are measured. [Others] may be involved, but sin is always, first and foremost, against God. Interesting that you state it is against women first, and then God as a tag along.


Message was edited by: HuntClub®


badge-donor-10yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

John 3:16; 14:1-6


Re: He upset a lot of social orders, not just women:


Apr 14, 2024, 5:24 PM
Reply

@ggosmitty this is a good example of what “blows my mind”.

To people arguing over what god wants and god is nowhere to be found in the conversation.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Do you get this equally freaked out when Dems & Pubs argue....


Apr 14, 2024, 5:27 PM
Reply

or when Tigers and Gamecocks argue? Geez, man. I'm tryin' to help you here with this fake act of yours.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Do you get this equally freaked out when Dems & Pubs argue....


Apr 14, 2024, 5:33 PM
Reply

I love it, point something out, get called fake lmao.

You guys sure are whiny little ####### when it comes to discussing religion in a RELIGION forum.

That’s apples and oranges. Religion is always just people telling you what god wants.

The proper analogy here would be two fans arguing about a team that doesn’t even exist.

Do you get it now? Are you up to speed on what im saying?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No, I'm not "up to speed" on what you're saying becuase you keep shifting....


Apr 14, 2024, 5:36 PM
Reply

BTW, God was mentioned directly in my response to Hunt Club. You don't even read the stuff you're critiquing.

But I get one thing. You don't believe in the Bible, and likely not God either. That's fine. I have no qualms with you, as this is a free country. But stop pretending this stuff blows your mind, you drama queen.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: No, I'm not "up to speed" on what you're saying becuase you keep shifting....


Apr 14, 2024, 5:45 PM
Reply

>BTW, God was mentioned directly in my response to Hunt Club. You don't even read the stuff you're critiquing.


See you're not even understanding what i'm saying still. I'm saying there are two people claiming they know what God wants, and he's not even there.

>But I get one thing. You don't believe in the Bible, and likely not God either. That's fine. I have no qualms with you, as this is a free country. But stop pretending this stuff blows your mind, you drama queen.


Maybe stop being so pedantic? "mind blown" isn't literal, you understand that.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"he's not even there"....huh?


Apr 14, 2024, 5:47 PM
Reply

### are you talking about? We're discussing treatment of females in the modern church, and quoting from the Bible, and trying to discern God's wishes. This shouldn't be all that difficult for you to stomach, this type of conversation. You're a whiny little drama queen.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "he's not even there"....huh?


Apr 14, 2024, 6:01 PM
Reply

>You're a whiny little drama queen.

Yeah, I sound like the whiny one...

>We're discussing treatment of females in the modern church, and quoting from the Bible, and trying to discern God's wishes. This shouldn't be all that difficult for you to stomach, this type of conversation.

It's not, I'm pointing out that it's weird to discuss the wishes of a being that doesn't exist.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

IMO, God does exist....


Apr 14, 2024, 6:14 PM
Reply

> Yeah, I sound like the whiny one...

Well, you're the one who inserted yourself into the discussion, and you do sound whiny. That's my view of your posts on this thread, as well as the other one. You insert yourself into these discussions, and try to make it sound like we're crazy and you're not. And I think there's a good bit of drama queen in that presentation. But sure, keep doing it if it makes you feel good.

> I'm pointing out that it's weird to discuss the wishes of a being that doesn't exist.

I guess in your view, it could be considered weird. I obviously think differently, as I'm not arguing over something that doesn't exist, IMO.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Understood....


Apr 15, 2024, 10:42 AM [ in reply to Re: He upset a lot of social orders, not just women: ]
Reply

And as an aside, I don't think "all baptists are going to Hell" just because they don't agree with me on female pastors. But I do have a profound disagreement with them on this issue. Some of the best pastors I've ever been around in the UMC were female. And the idea that they're locked out of that in some denominations is non-sensical on multiple fronts to me.

I was glad to see Rick Warren speak out recently after his church got booted from the SBC. He's right on this issue, and I hope one day the SBC will come around to Rick's view.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 42
| visibility 351
General Boards - Religion & Philosophy
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next