|
Replies: 22
| visibility 1
|
Scout Team [170]
TigerPulse: 53%
Posts: 264
Joined: 1/3/16
|
Team Recruiting rankings as of 3:45 Eastern
Feb 3, 2016, 3:55 PM
|
|
Team Recruiting Rankings
ESPN
1. LSU 2. FSU 3. ALABAMA 4. OLE MISS 5. OHIO STATE
RIVALS
1. ALABAMA 2. FSU 3. OHIO STATE 4. CLEMSON 5. LSU
24/7 SPORTS
1. ALABAMA 2. FSU 3. LSU 4. OHIO STATE 5. OLE MISS
SPORTS ILLUSTRATED
1. ALABAMA 2. OHIO STATE 3. FSU 4. LSU 5. OLE MISS
Congrats to Clemson on making the top 5 in one class anyways...
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Team Recruiting rankings as of 3:45 Eastern
Feb 3, 2016, 3:56 PM
|
|
Take your back handed compliment elsewhere.
Why are you even on this site?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [91402]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 45646
Joined: 10/18/09
|
Braggarts will be Braggards! Bet he didn't play a Down!
Feb 3, 2016, 3:57 PM
|
|
GoTiGERS..keep ROCKing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83625]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 63724
Joined: 12/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3025
Joined: 8/19/08
|
Come on back in January next year and get your @ss handed
Feb 3, 2016, 3:58 PM
|
|
to you. Then we'll see how these recruiting rankings shook out. No class toothless Bama fan. It's the ones like you that give the rest of them a bad name. How bout GTFO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
and we will be back to win it all***
Feb 3, 2016, 3:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [998]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1307
Joined: 6/22/15
|
Re: Team Recruiting rankings as of 3:45 Eastern
Feb 3, 2016, 3:58 PM
|
|
Ask Renfrow how much recruiting rankings matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [170]
TigerPulse: 53%
Posts: 264
Joined: 1/3/16
|
Re: Team Recruiting rankings as of 3:45 Eastern
Feb 3, 2016, 3:59 PM
|
|
Hey, I honestly don't think there is that much difference in the top 5, possibly top 10 classes. You guys didn't get Gary as you were so desperately hoping but you still got a good class. Better to get several really good players than just one great player, no?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
we weren't desperately hoping dumb ####...
Feb 3, 2016, 4:03 PM
|
|
Our dline is loaded and we already got a five star DT in this class. We are just loading up as much as possible. Not getting Nkemdiche 3 years had zero effect on us
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2278]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2811
Joined: 8/4/05
|
Re: Team Recruiting rankings as of 3:45 Eastern
Feb 3, 2016, 4:16 PM
[ in reply to Re: Team Recruiting rankings as of 3:45 Eastern ] |
|
"Hey, I honestly don't think there is that much difference in the top 5, possibly top 10 classes. You guys didn't get Gary as you were so desperately hoping but you still got a good class. Better to get several really good players than just one great player, no? "
It would have been nice to get Gary but I am not sure who was desperate. Big Dex may prove that he should have been number 1 we will see in the next three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3968]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3228
Joined: 10/20/11
|
Re: Team Recruiting rankings as of 3:45 Eastern
Feb 3, 2016, 4:00 PM
|
|
Meh, it's all subjective. Our difference makers > Your difference makers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [170]
TigerPulse: 53%
Posts: 264
Joined: 1/3/16
|
Re: Team Recruiting rankings as of 3:45 Eastern
Feb 3, 2016, 4:02 PM
|
|
> Meh, it's all subjective. Our difference makers > Your difference makers.
Maybe? Maybe not. Hope to see Clemson vs. Bama again in the playoffs again next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2728
Joined: 7/19/13
|
Bama has had a he!!uva close today***
Feb 3, 2016, 4:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15549]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21428
Joined: 9/24/07
|
Re: Bama has had a he!!uva close today***
Feb 3, 2016, 4:08 PM
|
|
I guess the prospect checks cleared the bank just in time yet again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [57972]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39873
Joined: 11/12/04
|
Everyone saw who can coach em up better. Saban needs to recruit 5*s so he
Feb 3, 2016, 4:00 PM
|
|
can just rotate them in. I'll take our coaches with top 10 classes against Saban's repeated #1s year after year. if we are in the top 5, nobody will stop us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [590]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 601
Joined: 9/19/06
|
BAMA class on display************
Feb 3, 2016, 4:05 PM
|
|
null
Message was edited by: RidgeTig®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [0]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2
Joined: 6/20/06
|
Re: BAMA class on display************
Feb 3, 2016, 4:11 PM
|
|
Everyone knows the tusks are loosa in Alabama
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [715]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1008
Joined: 4/11/10
|
Re: do you think there's a big difference
Feb 3, 2016, 4:10 PM
|
|
Honestly, do you thinks there's a big difference between a class in the top 5 and a class in the top 8? I sure as heck don't. It's about meeting needs, which Clemson most definitely did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17940]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16784
Joined: 9/1/12
|
Did Beer Bryant give you permission to post?***
Feb 3, 2016, 4:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2772]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3736
Joined: 1/15/13
|
Re: Team Recruiting rankings as of 3:45 Eastern
Feb 3, 2016, 4:12 PM
|
|
Where are your C0cKs??????
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [663]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 282
Joined: 7/20/99
|
Re: Team Recruiting rankings as of 3:45 Eastern
Feb 3, 2016, 4:12 PM
|
|
Is your next stop to the SC board to congratulate them on their top 25 class?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [170]
TigerPulse: 53%
Posts: 264
Joined: 1/3/16
|
Re: Team Recruiting rankings as of 3:45 Eastern
Feb 3, 2016, 5:28 PM
|
|
> Is your next stop to the SC board to congratulate
> them on their top 25 class?
Nope. I don't, and never have visited a USCe board... Maybe if Bama were to meet them in the CFP I might but...we all know that ain't happening...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3381]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3349
Joined: 10/6/02
|
Re: Team Recruiting rankings as of 3:45 Eastern
Feb 3, 2016, 4:40 PM
|
|
Without a few charity and legacy scholarships, this class would have been even higher. We got who we needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 22
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
