Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 55
| visibility 3,651

Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar

4
1

Nov 20, 2023, 8:41 AM
Reply

- We have been horrible on the road this year losing 3 of 4 with the only win coming at a lowly Syracuse team that just fired their coach
- Cade's never played in an environment like this on the road (the closest is at NC State, but Willy B doesn't really compare). This is concerning because Cade can make bonehead decisions when he gets emotionally invested. He will get provoked.
- Rattler's mobility is a problem. Mobile QBs have gashed us in the run game.
- SCar now believes they can beat us. Their recent winning streak, the fact that they've played well at home, having beat us last year, along with us having a down year this year will give them confidence.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Aint happening bro***

7

Nov 20, 2023, 8:51 AM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Eh I only agree with parts of your take

15

Nov 20, 2023, 8:55 AM
Reply

Their “confidence” is misplaced. Jax State honestly should’ve beaten them and Vandy and Kentucky are terrible. Clemson’s three game streak is more impressive.

The big key for me is the turnovers. We can’t afford a bunch of turnovers or any points off those turnovers. We have to play a clean game.

And please no trick plays. We don’t have the personnel to pull that off and it usually blows up in our face. Just line up and play and the result will take care of itself.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Eh I only agree with parts of your take

4

Nov 20, 2023, 8:56 AM
Reply

Facts.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You're right about the trick plays

1
8

Nov 20, 2023, 9:05 AM [ in reply to Eh I only agree with parts of your take ]
Reply

My biggest knock on Dabo is that he sometimes doesn't coach our team like we're a Big Dog. All these fake punts and things are unnecessary when you know you have the superior team. He gets cute way more than necessary.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Eh I only agree with parts of your take

1

Nov 20, 2023, 9:19 AM [ in reply to Eh I only agree with parts of your take ]
Reply

BINGO
Go Tigers!!! Beat South Carolina!!!

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"If a pig had a better personality, he would cease to be a filthy animal."


Re: Eh I only agree with parts of your take


Nov 20, 2023, 12:25 PM [ in reply to Eh I only agree with parts of your take ]
Reply

Don't forget how good Miss State is either. 🤣

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thats a bad football team down there in cootlumbia

8

Nov 20, 2023, 8:55 AM
Reply

Really no excuse to lose to them. My only pause would be that there want any excuse to lose to them last year either.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Last year is all you need to know that stupid ish could happen.***

1
1

Nov 20, 2023, 9:27 AM
Reply



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Anybody that says Coach Brownell is the best coach to come through Clemson is going to start an argument." -JP Hall


Re: Last year is all you need to know that stupid ish could happen.***

2

Nov 20, 2023, 9:38 AM
Reply

Let’s hope we left the last dose of stupid in the NC State locker room after that atrocity

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Were not going to see another 8 for 29***


Nov 20, 2023, 6:51 PM [ in reply to Last year is all you need to know that stupid ish could happen.*** ]
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How long you been watching sports, champ?***

1

Nov 20, 2023, 9:33 AM [ in reply to Thats a bad football team down there in cootlumbia ]
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar

7

Nov 20, 2023, 8:56 AM
Reply

If we control the line of scrimmage and limit our mistakes, we will be just fine. Get the run game going and all Cade has to do is be a good game manager. He won't have to be a hero and go for crazy plays. Just play within himself and take what the defense gives him. Our D will stand up strong and put a lot of pressure on Rat and our secondary will keep him in check.

I'm confident we are playing well enough to get the job done and believe it will be another Clemson victory on Saturday.

Oh, one last thing. Don't let it come down to a FG...

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Field goals will play no role in this game.***


Nov 20, 2023, 10:57 AM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar

4

Nov 20, 2023, 8:56 AM
Reply

IF---and this season that's been a big if---IF we protect the football and don't get cute on special teams, we will win. It's that simple.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Screw Calford.


Their recent win streak...

3

Nov 20, 2023, 8:57 AM
Reply

against Mother Teresa and the Weak Sisters of the Pitiful and Incompetent?

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


'Everybody has a plan till they get punched in the nose.'***

2

Nov 20, 2023, 8:58 AM
Reply



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 'Everybody has a plan till they get punched in the nose.'***

2

Nov 20, 2023, 9:03 AM
Reply

I completely agree with this, and thought exactly that when UNC had 198 yards at the end of the first quarter saturday. But man, I was extremely proud of how we responded. Not always pretty, but plenty of both fight and guts.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 'Everybody has a plan till they get punched in the nose.'***


Nov 20, 2023, 4:51 PM
Reply

The number of big plays they had in the first half had to have added up to 150-200 yards. We need to limit the number of big plays.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar

5

Nov 20, 2023, 9:02 AM
Reply

“Rattler Mobility is a problem” = he is averaging 8 rushing yards per game.

“Mobile QBs have gashed us in the run game” = Against the top two mobile QBs (King and Armstrong) we have given up a total of 2 yards

Strengths lean heavily to Clemson in this game. I agree our roadtrips have been a nightmare, hopefully we learned something from those experiences.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar

1
1

Nov 20, 2023, 9:14 AM
Reply

Armstrong doesn’t count because he barely played and he’s a different style qb.. Rattler is more like Travis, Mayes and yes King.. but Travis and Mayes did keep drives alive by scrambling as did Riley early.. need to keep him in the pocket or spy him. He doesn’t need 60+ yards at the end of the day just keep drives alive and we have been vulnerable to that at times

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

8 yards a game?

1

Nov 20, 2023, 9:37 AM
Reply

Rattler May scramble for a first down or two, but he’s not Jordan Travis or Drake Maye. That’s crazy.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

2 of the last 3 games we've been gashed by the QB

1
1

Nov 20, 2023, 9:20 AM [ in reply to Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar ]
Reply

Fair point on King, but Hartman averaged 10yds a carry and Maye averaged 7. We also know what Duke's Leonard did to us in game 1. Rattler's been sacked a lot, which I believe is tied to your run stats so his rush numbers are modest, but I've seen enough SCar games to know that Rattler is capable and he can hurt us with his legs considering we play so much man coverage. If I'm SCar, that would definitely be part of my game plan to supplement the run game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 2 of the last 3 games we've been gashed by the QB


Nov 20, 2023, 12:11 PM
Reply

Exactly right ...... not the number of yards he has at the end of the game, but the first downs he may get on scrambles to keep a drive alive.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thought the same things. Has the dude watched any games?***

1

Nov 20, 2023, 9:35 AM [ in reply to Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar ]
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Thought the same things. Has the dude watched any games?***


Nov 20, 2023, 9:55 AM
Reply

I have watched them play plenty and have noticed Rattler running more as of late. Not designed runs but escaping the pocket. Like the post above mentioned sacks are included and he’s one of the most sacked qbs in college so his stats reflect that. He’s not blazing fast but has good vision and can take off. As long as we have Wiggins on Xavier Legget and keep Rattler contained we will be fine and probably win by 30

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Thought the same things. Has the dude watched any games?***


Nov 20, 2023, 4:10 PM
Reply

Everyone keeps saying Legette, but I’m telling you I’m more concerned about containing Juice Wells.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar

2

Nov 20, 2023, 9:10 AM
Reply

What do you mean Cade makes boneheaded mistakes? He' s a gamer, he heady, he's a grinder...for God's sake he's a 5 star😂😂😂😂.
There's no way this game should be close. Clemson has more overall talent at every position. If the Cade and offense doesn't turn the ball over or no special foul ups this game should be over by the end of the 3rd quarter.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar

2

Nov 20, 2023, 9:15 AM
Reply

We just can’t get cute. Play solid ball

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"We just can't play cute"...


Nov 20, 2023, 9:20 AM
Reply

sez the guy with the cute kid as his avatar.

:)

I agree 10,000% btw

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "We just can't play cute"...

1

Nov 20, 2023, 9:21 AM
Reply

What’s even funnier is that “kid” is 23-24 in that picture.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar

3

Nov 20, 2023, 9:21 AM
Reply

Let our defense do what they do. Get to Rattler and “rattle” him good. NO TURNOVERS!!
And for the love of God, not stupid trick, fake punt calls(Dabo). Execute and we win comfortably.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Mobile QB's have not gashed us. It is the unmobile QB's which have.

1

Nov 20, 2023, 9:22 AM
Reply

When we prep for a running QB such as King at GT we have a strong gameplan.

It is QB's such as Hartman and Maye that have gotten big runs with their legs.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car."

"I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it."


Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar

3

Nov 20, 2023, 9:24 AM
Reply

We need to lay the wood to Ratturd and that will make him think twice about running. XT needs to have a game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar

1

Nov 20, 2023, 9:32 AM
Reply

They struggled to score 17 points against Kentucky. Some have concerns about their WR's. No one else has had major problems with them except the teams they managed to beat which were not good teams.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


As long as we dont have crazy turnovers

1

Nov 20, 2023, 9:30 AM
Reply

we’ll beat the snot out of them. They suck and you may want to look closer at their “3 game winning streak”. UK was the best win, and that’s a shell of the UK team they were last year. Rattler is less of a running threat than Jordan Travis and Drake Maye. They beat us last year because DJ couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn with less than a 30% completion rate. I’ve never seen that in my life and we won’t see it Saturday. Whether or not the c0cks thinks they can beat us or not is irrelevant. It’s solely about us, and we are out for blood.

Tigers win.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Not only are you correct, but I'm also worried about dumb game management

1
4

Nov 20, 2023, 9:31 AM
Reply

Such as:

1) going to the well one too many times with certain plays (up the gut when it ain't working or when it's already been done;

2) Running generally predictable play calls (oscillating between screens and up the guts) way too often, and in such a way as to waste early downs with plays the D knows is coming and put us in 2nd and 3rd and long situations.

3) Throwing to extremely shallow routes really often (sometimes even behind the line of scrimmage), which take a bit to develop and allow the D to get react to minimize gain; again, this often wastes downs and is also too frequent and thus predictable.

4) Poor clock management - poor strategy at nursing a lead . . . either at the end of a half or the game. This applies both to when and how aggressively we try (or don't try) to run out the clock, as well as how overly obvious the play calls are in the process. It's one thing to be **generally** conservative when it's called for (keep the ball on the ground, let the clock roll) - that's all well and good . . . but that doesn't mean you have to basically call plays that are doomed to fail . . . you can still at least TRY to get a first down - it doesn't have to be up the gut every time - you can run off-tackle, take it to the outside, a bootleg, etc.

5) Going for it when we don't need to in situations in which we've failed time and again to get short yardage - an unnecessary risk that, depending on the distance, is sacrificing an easy 3 . . . and yes even with PK problems, some FG's are still high probability scenarios . . . it just depends on the distance of course.

6) Failing to adequately utilize the middle-range pass options . . . as if the dichotomy is between throwing either behind the line of scrimmage or 35 yards down field.


Clemson don't have to get fancy or overly cute, but for goodness sake it doesn't need to be as dry as desert sand, either. There needs to be a bit of killer instinct and innovation in the playcalling and game management.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Lol!!!!

1

Nov 20, 2023, 9:45 AM
Reply

It’s hilarious how you act like you’re seeing all that. They were just talking about you on The Roar. You do not know more than the coaches - down and distance, personnel, defensive style and the way their coach is calling the game, etc etc etc. People who sit in the stands and pretend to know all you do are kinda funny. No offense.

If we don’t turn it over we win. That’s all there is to it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Hey DA, this is a message board. Freaking troll.***


Nov 20, 2023, 9:54 AM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Gimmie a break . . .

4

Nov 20, 2023, 10:04 AM [ in reply to Lol!!!! ]
Reply

I am seeing that, and so are hoards of others that are too. And there are demonstrable effects to it in many cases. It does not always come back to bite, but sometimes it does, and it always could. It's a consistent set of discernable tendencies that your summary hand-waving can't get of. Down and distance, personnel, defensive tendencies . . . yes those things matter, and no they are not categorically absent as you think from the analysis of those who've been seen these things and noticing them. "The coaches [always] know best" hand-waving doesn't cut it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Hoards? Or just the guys talking the complainers motto points?


Nov 20, 2023, 6:55 PM
Reply

Yeah, it’s a couple people like yourself still clinging to these unfounded narratives.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Your first problem is that you believe "The Roar"....

1

Nov 20, 2023, 11:55 AM [ in reply to Lol!!!! ]
Reply

lol

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

MY only concern for the Clemson / SCar game

1

Nov 20, 2023, 10:16 AM
Reply

is staying awake so i will make it to the end of the game.

gonna have to meter my Busch latte intake.. of start drinking some crown and cokes.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Geville Tiger on Clemson football , "Dabo's only problem is he has to deal with turd fans questioning every move he makes.”


Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar

2

Nov 20, 2023, 10:18 AM
Reply

We will have the most speed on the edge they’ve faced since UGA. Their depth at OL is now worse than it was against UNC & UGA. Our DL backups have been getting game time all year. All we gotta do is make them rely on short yard passes (slants primarily) in response to getting sacked/throwing away and we will force errant throws.

A lot of teams respect our secondary, and that’s why quick slants and crossers have been a go to. When the game moves that quick for opposing offenses, mistakes are bound to happen with how impactful our defense has been.

Giving up rushing yards to a QB is going to happen with how we play defense, but even with Hartman and Maye making plays with their legs, that alone was not enough. And it certainly won’t be enough for SC to win either.

There are only three reasons we lose to them: (1) turnovers; (2) multiple busted coverages; or (3) not sticking with the run game. The exact same reasons we lost last year.

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Also, will we fake a punt again this week?***

1

Nov 20, 2023, 10:22 AM
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"All those 'Fire Brownell' guys can kiss it." -Joseph Girard III

"Everybody needs to know that Coach Brownell is arguably the best coach to come through Clemson." -PJ Hall


Re: Also, will we fake a punt again this week?***


Nov 20, 2023, 10:25 AM
Reply

As long as it isn’t the three stooges kickoff return…

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I doubt it . . .

2

Nov 20, 2023, 10:26 AM [ in reply to Also, will we fake a punt again this week?*** ]
Reply

It hasn't turned out well. It was a **hideously awful** call against Tech there was simply no situational need or justification for it whatsoever . . . none. I'm not sure if the staff realizes how blisteringly stupid it was . . . but maybe the failure of both plays will disabuse them of trying. Carolina has enough problems that we may not need try things like that . . . hopefully.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

NOPE***


Nov 20, 2023, 2:18 PM
Reply



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar


Nov 20, 2023, 3:44 PM
Reply

Superior team?? You know you have 2 more wins than us with an easier schedule right??

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar


Nov 20, 2023, 4:18 PM
Reply

We just dominated a team that beat you by 2 TDs in your house without their best WR on the field. I mean I’m fairly certain that 99% of the rest of the country outside of Columbia would deem Clemson the Superior team. We’re better at RB, TE, O Line, and every defensive position. South Carolina gets the nod at WR and Special teams. Rattler and Cade have similar numbers so I’ll say push with the needle a little more towards Rattler.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Easier schedule??? HMMMMM***


Nov 20, 2023, 4:30 PM [ in reply to Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar ]
Reply



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Lol.


Nov 20, 2023, 4:32 PM [ in reply to Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar ]
Reply

Just no.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Despite us having the superior team these are the concerns vs SCar


Nov 20, 2023, 3:56 PM
Reply

You have good points and I think they will have times in the game where they will move the ball through the air. Last year they got some key 4th downs that kept them in that game and we very aggressive with it.
I think if we take care of the football, we slowly pull away. If we lose the turnover margin.. it could be uncomfortable.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Give up, coot.***


Nov 20, 2023, 4:13 PM
Reply



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

This is their worst team in a long time


Nov 20, 2023, 4:52 PM
Reply

Shouldn’t be close

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

On the bright side....


Nov 20, 2023, 7:51 PM
Reply

They probably assumed they didn't have a snowball's chance in #### of beating us at home last year. I doubt they ever factored in a coaching-staff meltdown by Dabo's staff.

In other words....thinking you can win, and winning aren't the same thing.

When coaching is about equal I tend to lean towards the team with better athletes. I like our chances.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 55
| visibility 3,651
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic