At what point do analysts strike up a different narrative about Renfrow? I get that the underdog storyline for him is appealing, but at this point it’s a disservice to how good of a wide receiver he really is. Despite what the talking heads say, he isn’t effective because he “sneaks up” on defenses. He hasn’t torched Alabama two times now because they didn’t perceive him as a threat. He’s been effective against them because he’s a #### good wide receiver. You don’t have to be 6-3 or run a sub 4.3 to beat the man in front of you.