Replies: 24
| visibility 1
|
CU Guru [1357]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 2671
Joined: 8/24/04
|
Venable sucks
Sep 22, 2012, 11:18 PM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
110%er [7204]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10168
Joined: 6/27/07
|
must be new to clemson
Sep 22, 2012, 11:23 PM
|
|
venables is fine. our personel is lacking something fierce. It's the same squad as last year and these are the same results. Simple, we need help. Our secondary blows and no one is going to get better. They just don't have what it takes on d this year.
You think tonight is bad. wait for GT
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7023]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 12753
Joined: 11/21/99
|
Re: must be new to clemson
Sep 22, 2012, 11:32 PM
|
|
Falls on everyone's favorite phoney dabo
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [629]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 878
Joined: 1/1/02
|
He has the same problem Steele had.
Sep 22, 2012, 11:24 PM
|
|
Lack of talent, lack of experience, lack of depth.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1357]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 2671
Joined: 8/24/04
|
Re: He has the same problem Steele had.
Sep 22, 2012, 11:27 PM
|
|
We've got at least 3 4 or 5* LBs, yet somehow we still cannot stop the run. That's scheme.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [646]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1527
Joined: 6/22/00
|
Re: He has the same problem Steele had.
Sep 22, 2012, 11:29 PM
|
|
I do not think it is scheme. We had players in position to make the plays a lot but they just could not do it.
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [96]
TigerPulse: 65%
Posts: 457
Joined: 6/27/03
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [312]
TigerPulse: 48%
Posts: 835
Joined: 2/2/02
|
Talent? Lack of talent???? We've had better recruiting on
Sep 22, 2012, 11:31 PM
[ in reply to He has the same problem Steele had. ] |
|
defense than offense the past few years. Amazing how when they get here, they suddenly can't make plays. That's called player development. We need to do a better job of that. That and strength training, quite obviously.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2196]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4913
Joined: 1/20/03
|
No, No, and Yes
Sep 22, 2012, 11:33 PM
[ in reply to He has the same problem Steele had. ] |
|
Plenty enough talent to at least play mediocre defense.
Plenty enough experience to at least play mediocre defense.
Not much depth with experience.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2073]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3425
Joined: 8/14/00
|
As do you***
Sep 22, 2012, 11:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [328]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 759
Joined: 10/14/06
|
Re: Venable sucks
Sep 22, 2012, 11:28 PM
|
|
The only guy he actually recruited can't even play this year. What do you want him to do with Steele's leftover crap?
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1357]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 2671
Joined: 8/24/04
|
Stewad, anthony, townsend, parker.
Sep 22, 2012, 11:30 PM
|
|
All 4* an 5*, and that's just at LB.
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [126]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 328
Joined: 9/18/11
|
So you think sophomore LBs can solve these problems??
Sep 22, 2012, 11:32 PM
|
|
Delusional
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1357]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 2671
Joined: 8/24/04
|
Re: So you think sophomore LBs can solve these problems??
Sep 22, 2012, 11:34 PM
|
|
Wjy is it delusional to expect 400 yards of offense and 31 points to e able to win you a game? All your defense has to do is not completely sh*t the bed.
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [126]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 328
Joined: 9/18/11
|
Re: So you think sophomore LBs can solve these problems??
Sep 22, 2012, 11:38 PM
|
|
Because it is one F'n game against a legit Top 3 team, on the road!
Because what talent we have is VERY young and the old players simply aren't talented.
Because this FSU team has LIGHT YEARS more talent on both lines.
Because this FSU team has LIGHT YEARS more talent in the secondary.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1357]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 2671
Joined: 8/24/04
|
Re: So you think sophomore LBs can solve these problems??
Sep 22, 2012, 11:41 PM
|
|
Why does beating us make them legit top 3? They beat a team that is literally 50% not so good at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [126]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 328
Joined: 9/18/11
|
Why does our beating Auburn by 7 mean
Sep 22, 2012, 11:44 PM
|
|
we are not 50% good at all when the same Auburn team just lost by 2 to #2 LSU, and had a decent shot to win at the end???
See, your logic makes NO sense
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1357]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 2671
Joined: 8/24/04
|
Re: Why does our beating Auburn by 7 mean
Sep 22, 2012, 11:47 PM
|
|
Auburn's offense is terrible and we spotted them 19. Your logic is based on an Auburn morsl victory and u say i'm not making semse? Lmbo.
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [903]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 499
Joined: 10/21/00
|
Re: Venable sucks
Sep 22, 2012, 11:31 PM
|
|
90% of our talent is on the offensive side of the ball. Champions have the best athletes on the defensive side of the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2521]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3422
Joined: 9/1/19
|
Our D has sucked since at least 2009
Sep 22, 2012, 11:35 PM
|
|
Flash back to 2009 when we never got the Nerds off the field. Dabo needs to fix this!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [126]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 328
Joined: 9/18/11
|
Actually, the 2010 defense was pretty good, but only
Sep 22, 2012, 11:39 PM
|
|
because we had like 7 future NFL players on the field.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1357]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 2671
Joined: 8/24/04
|
Re: Actually, the 2010 defense was pretty good, but only
Sep 22, 2012, 11:44 PM
|
|
We have developed a proud tradition of underachieving on defense.
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [130]
TigerPulse: 64%
Posts: 207
Joined: 4/10/11
|
I AGREE 100%***
Sep 22, 2012, 11:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [840]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 2112
Joined: 9/27/08
|
keep in mind that the assistants are still the same...
Sep 22, 2012, 11:47 PM
|
|
GO TIGERS !!!
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 1
|
|
|