|
Replies: 50
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [2021]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3081
Joined: 7/30/04
|
breast cancer explosion since vaccines
1
1
Jun 30, 2023, 9:45 AM
|
|
https://www.cancer.org/content/###/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2019/estimated-new-cases-for-the-four-major-cancers-by-sex-and-age-group-2019.pdf
https://www.cancer.org/content/###/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2020/estimated-number-new-cases-by-sex-and-age-group-2020.pdf
https://www.cancer.org/content/###/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2021/2021-case-estimates-by-age.pdf
https://www.cancer.org/content/###/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2022/2022-case-estimates-by-age.pdf
https://www.cancer.org/content/###/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2023/sd1-cases-4-cancers-2023-cff.pdf
Year All under 50
2019 268,970 26,660
2020 276,480 26,500
2021 281,550 26,510
2022 287,850 47,550
2023 297,790 48,780
That's a lot of standard deviations
I have seen several people in my circle with different "turbo" cancers in the last year alone. Sad
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [10901]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15072
Joined: 8/6/10
|
Totally a coincidence bruh***
2
Jun 30, 2023, 9:46 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34113]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33621
Joined: 9/13/99
|
Sorry, gotta skip this one, too. Have fun, ya nitwits!***
3
Jun 30, 2023, 9:49 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3227]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4096
Joined: 6/24/23
|
Re: breast cancer explosion since vaccines
7
7
Jun 30, 2023, 9:52 AM
|
|
I also heard submersible implosion deaths off of Newfoundland are up something like 10,000% since the COVID vaccines came out. Can't be coincidence. People need to not be sheep and to see the obvious. Open your eyes people!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [137988]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 63824
Joined: 10/22/00
|
I could be wrong, but it sounds like
2
Jun 30, 2023, 10:00 AM
|
|
Biden Presidencies dramatically increase breast cancer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22718
Joined: 9/27/04
|
Oh, Mr. Trump shares just as much of the vaccine blame as JB
1
3
Jun 30, 2023, 10:09 AM
|
|
Folks are so dug into their thoughts on the vaccine... both normal citizens, as well as politicians, media, etc.... that we can't have honest discussion. In any other time, we would be all over trending statistics like these, searching for causation.
Can't do it now. Maybe there's another cause... maybe the numbers are BS... I don't know... but as long as it's polarized and folks are so invested... financially and emotionally..., both sides will be skeptical of the other.
Transparency is the best medicine for this
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24815]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42569
Joined: 7/31/10
|
"Transparency is the best medicine for" DC... Won't happen.***
2
Jun 30, 2023, 10:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22718
Joined: 9/27/04
|
Yep.
1
Jun 30, 2023, 10:24 AM
|
|
In general, I'm a Trump guy, but I don't think he would get to the bottom of it either, because he was pushing the Vaccine hard for a while.
I think RFKjr would push to get to the bottom of. He's a skeptic, but from what I've seen, he's open to changing his opinions as the facts are proven out. (I think his energy policy is complete whack-a-do, so I'm not sold on him as a president, YET).
Clearly any other candidate that I've heard about would not even begin to bring any transparency to DC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7159]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 9717
Joined: 10/6/21
|
Re: Yep.
Jun 30, 2023, 2:41 PM
|
|
We’ll never know if Trump would have gotten to the bottom of vax safety problems. During his final 10 months in office, he justifiably didn’t have time for this to get done.
Biden, with an infinitely less complicated job than what Trump had to take on, hasn’t lifted a finger to get to the bottom of this since coming into office ~ 30 months ago.
RFK, Jr. will indeed get to the bottom of this, if by some miracle, the DNC informs the media, school system & university employees, and crony capitalists in the private sector to get on board with the RFK, Jr. campaign.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2021]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3081
Joined: 7/30/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
Can you explain how you know it's vaccines and not
1
3
Jun 30, 2023, 10:08 AM
|
|
covid itself?
Do you really not know that covid can cause all kinds of long term health problems?
It is super odd to me that you guys are worried about the relatively few side effects of the vaccine, but not the virus itself.
Not to mention, the vaccines saved so many lives. You guys spreading this drivel are bad actors for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22718
Joined: 9/27/04
|
Re: Can you explain how you know it's vaccines and not
3
Jun 30, 2023, 10:20 AM
|
|
Can you explain how you know it's vaccines and not covid itself?
No I can't... but I'm not a member of the scientific community... Maybe it's both. Maybe it's neither... but it's SOMETHING. (if those statistics are true) Statistics don't trend like that for no reason. If you have any vested interest in breast cancer, then you should want to know why. Putting your head in the sand is no better than making wild-asss guesses as to the cause. The folks with the brains and knowledge need to be looking for the answer, but with billions and billions of dollars (and egos) involved, I am skeptical that you'll get an honest investigation. Call me a skeptic.
Do you really not know that covid can cause all kinds of long term health problems?
Sure it can.
It is super odd to me that you guys are worried about the relatively few side effects of the vaccine, but not the virus itself.
Yea, I agree with that somewhat. Clearly the vaccine was man-made, is/was politicised more, and it has a face... Fauci... right or wrong, you can put a face on the vaccine and it makes it easier to blame. I whole heartedly think the vaccine was also man-made, but it's harder to put a face on the virus cause. Is it the entire medical community? Scientists? China? Wet market shoppers? It's a little more vague. I think that's maybe why folks tend to focus on the vaccine.... OR, maybe it's because you can't make a decision to get Covid... it was unavoidable to an extent. Getting the vaccine, on the other hand, was completely avoidable. Politicians weren't advocating for you to get Covid, but they sure as heck advocated for the Vaccine. I think that also plays into why people focus on it.
Not to mention, the vaccines saved so many lives. You guys spreading this drivel are bad actors for sure.
I believe it saved lives. I also think it has caused issues, and those issues are not being investigated in good faith... which generates skepticism. That doesn't make me a bad actor, it makes me a skeptic.
Message was edited by: ryanadidas®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
Re: Can you explain how you know it's vaccines and not
1
Jun 30, 2023, 10:42 AM
|
|
> I believe it saved lives. I also think it has caused issues, and those issues are not being investigated in good faith... which generates skepticism. That doesn't make me a bad actor, it makes me a skeptic.
That's what vaccines are, though, the benefits outweigh the risks. None of them are without risks. There are hundreds of thousands of Americans alone that didn't have to die. I didn't say YOU in particular are a bad actor, but people pushing conspiracy nonsense definitely have blood on their hands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24815]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42569
Joined: 7/31/10
|
Lack of investigation = "conspiracy nonsense". This is a lot
2
Jun 30, 2023, 10:47 AM
|
|
like the Hunter Biden 'investigation' and all its roadblocks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
Re: Lack of investigation = "conspiracy nonsense". This is a lot
1
Jun 30, 2023, 10:49 AM
|
|
If that's what you think I said, I can understand why you are so confused all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24815]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42569
Joined: 7/31/10
|
I'm skeptical, too.***
Jun 30, 2023, 10:51 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7159]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 9717
Joined: 10/6/21
|
Re: Lack of investigation = "conspiracy nonsense". This is a lot
Jun 30, 2023, 2:48 PM
[ in reply to Re: Lack of investigation = "conspiracy nonsense". This is a lot ] |
|
It’s called studying how the statistics of breast cancer cases correlates to vax injections.
Lag variables are a commonly accepted means of conducting correlation analyses.
Hypothetical example:
(1). Vax numbers rise quickly starting Feb.2021 through July 2021, and then level off from August 2021 through March 2022.
(2). Breast cancer rates rise quickly starting Jan. 2022 through June 2022, and then level off from July 2022 thru Feb. 2023.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
Re: Lack of investigation = "conspiracy nonsense". This is a lot
Jul 3, 2023, 9:07 AM
|
|
Is this, in your mind, conclusive evidence that the covid vaccine is causing breast cancer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7159]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 9717
Joined: 10/6/21
|
Re: Lack of investigation = "conspiracy nonsense". This is a lot
1
Jul 3, 2023, 10:53 AM
|
|
No. It is conclusive evidence that our health authorities will not conduct a sincere and thorough investigation because they are concerned that doing such a study will undermine their propaganda narrative about the vax safety.
Unlike some other belated investigations in which the data correlating an illness to the vax & / or the virus itself, this breast cancer / vax correlation looks hard to spin.
Don’t expect any sincere and thorough investigation any time soon.
In the meanwhile, encourage post-pubescent female loved ones to never miss and not delay their annual cancer screenings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2021]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3081
Joined: 7/30/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
Re: Can you explain how you know it's vaccines and not
1
1
Jun 30, 2023, 11:51 AM
|
|
Um.. easy
The unvaccinated cohort died much more frequently than the vaccinated one did. Therefore, scaring people off of taking the vaccine literally led to unnecessary deaths.
It really is that simple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2021]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3081
Joined: 7/30/04
|
Re: Can you explain how you know it's vaccines and not
1
Jun 30, 2023, 11:54 AM
|
|
not what the Dr below states
believe the propaganda
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
Re: Can you explain how you know it's vaccines and not
1
Jun 30, 2023, 12:03 PM
|
|
Oh, you found A doctor?
You can find A phd that thinks evolution is false.
Idiots with PhD's are a dime a dozen. You are cherry picking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22718
Joined: 9/27/04
|
Yea, but that cuts both ways.
1
Jun 30, 2023, 12:49 PM
|
|
Every court case that's ever happened had highly credentialed experts on both sides arguing the exact opposite points.
If one side has the microphone, then that doesn't make them correct by default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
Re: Yea, but that cuts both ways.
Jun 30, 2023, 12:55 PM
|
|
> Every court case that's ever happened had highly credentialed experts on both sides arguing the exact opposite points.
Aside from the fact that that isn't a true statement at all, it's not at all analogous to finding a fringe expert that comports to your view.
> If one side has the microphone, then that doesn't make them correct by default.
I agree. However, when the vast majority of the data and science is on one side, it's probably a good idea to trust that over some moron on Twitter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7159]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 9717
Joined: 10/6/21
|
Re: Yea, but that cuts both ways.
1
Jun 30, 2023, 2:54 PM
|
|
It’s hard to find a more committed lefty propagandist.
The lefty chooses to deflect, but will not address the matter that increasing vax usage correlates to increasing rates of breast cancer.
Instead, the lefty will refer to something (anything) that distracts from the subject. And the. The lefty will argue that his irrelevancy is relevant.
Lefties would do better by growing a long beard, wrap themselves up in rainbow colored robes, and chanting ‘Orange Man bad, Orange Man bad.’
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
Re: Yea, but that cuts both ways.
Jun 30, 2023, 7:01 PM
|
|
Go away, your opinions are just too dumb to interact with anymore
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2021]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3081
Joined: 7/30/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
Re: Can you explain how you know it's vaccines and not
Jul 1, 2023, 10:39 PM
|
|
i'd love to see the data showing so, I bet you can't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
Re: Can you explain how you know it's vaccines and not
Jul 3, 2023, 9:07 AM
|
|
That's what I thought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7159]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 9717
Joined: 10/6/21
|
Re: Can you explain how you know it's vaccines and not
1
Jun 30, 2023, 8:35 PM
[ in reply to Re: Can you explain how you know it's vaccines and not ] |
|
Dr. Peter McCullough (former vice chief of medicine at Baylor University Medical Center) co-authored a paper ~ 2 years ago which explained how mRNA based COVID vaccines interfere with the human immune system. All cancers develop from mutant cells which escape detection of the immune system. Weakened immune systems only make it easier for mutant cells to escape detection from the immune system; higher incidences of cancer are the consequence.
AIDS killed a lot of people because those people with severely impaired immune systems got cancer at a very high rate.
COVID, for all that the disease does to damage human body tissue, has not been associated with severe damage to the human immune system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2021]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3081
Joined: 7/30/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
I mean this is the problem, you get your information from
1
Jun 30, 2023, 11:52 AM
|
|
bs like this. It's unreal how well it works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2021]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3081
Joined: 7/30/04
|
Re: I mean this is the problem, you get your information from
1
Jun 30, 2023, 11:54 AM
|
|
BS - how?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2021]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3081
Joined: 7/30/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
Re: I mean this is the problem, you get your information from
2
Jun 30, 2023, 12:06 PM
|
|
Do you think americasfrontlinedoctors.org is a legitmate source?
LOL
https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1533 Founder of America’s Frontline Doctors is sentenced to prison for role in Capitol riot Simone Gold, a Beverly Hills physician who founded a doctors’ organisation that challenged pandemic public health measures and promoted unproven covid therapies, has been sentenced to 60 days in prison by a US federal court in Washington, DC, for illegally entering the US Capitol building during the riot on 6 January 2021.
Gold came to prominence in July 2020 with a viral video introducing America’s Frontline Doctors on the steps of the US Supreme Court. Seven white coated physicians denounced lockdowns and masks, questioned the utility of vaccines, and touted the benefits of hydroxychloroquine, a drug which had recently been endorsed by Donald Trump.
Most of the organisation had no experience treating covid patients, but Gold was then a working emergency department physician. Trump later retweeted the video, making her an overnight star in the conservative media. She has 482 000 Twitter followers, is banned by Facebook, and …
https://www.businessinsider.com/americas-frontline-doctors-sells-disproven-covid-drugs-2021-9
Again, it's just unreal how people like you are attracted to this crap like flies on ####.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7159]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 9717
Joined: 10/6/21
|
Re: I mean this is the problem, you get your information from
1
Jun 30, 2023, 8:38 PM
|
|
Another deflection. It’s getting boring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2053]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 2989
Joined: 11/29/22
|
Re: I mean this is the problem, you get your information from
Jul 1, 2023, 9:13 AM
|
|
So you think the source he posted is legitimate?
Of course you do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2021]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3081
Joined: 7/30/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [97756]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 64886
Joined: 7/13/02
|
I follow the virus, not the vaccines
2
Jun 30, 2023, 11:57 AM
[ in reply to Can you explain how you know it's vaccines and not ] |
|
There are two camps full of wrong about covid immune damage. I've said for years it damages the immune system. Cancer is in this arena too. I've posted studies showing the specific damage, from natural infections. I've also posted studies showing the damage does not happen from vaccines.
But the two camps of wrong are strong, polarized, and they both suck all the oxygen from the third possibility no one will accept (more importantly...vote for).
The first camp admits that immune damage exists, and every other covid issue, but they blame the vaccines and not the virus. They blame Pfizer, Bill Gates, Fauci, and the entire list, except Trump of course. The second camp, blames masks and lockdowns for something they've labeled "immunity debt". These people deny immune damage exists, and all the severe infections we're seeing, common infections being more severe and presenting differently, odd flu in the summers, and new viruses such as monkeypox, rare fungal infections, etc, they blame those things on immunity debt. The idea that lockdowns and masking damaged immune systems by keeping people healthy and unexposed to normal circulating viruses and bacteria. And this contradicts the "masks don't work" crowd, but I digress.
It is what it is I guess. People are people. They will believe whatever they want to believe. Personally, my choice to take the vaccine was based on the information I had at the time, which hasn't changed much. Some of that information has still not been admitted by the CDC, Fauci, or anyone in "public health". The logic goes if you're going to inhale the S genes and entire covid virus into your upper and lower respiratory system anyway, and the S genes are the same as the virus, might as well get some "safer" immunity to prevent a severe illness. I didn't take them, from day one in May 2021, with any expectation they would slow, or stop transmission. I was already on record saying they wouldn't, and we already knew natural immunity was brief. Those were lies from the CDC and I knew that. But again, IF the mRNA is the exact same as the original virus, and it doesn't make you severely sick, might as well get a head start on some type of immunity to prevent severe illness.
I haven't had a covid vaccine/booster since 11/2021. That was a booster, and the last shot. Again, following the virus, I didn't get another booster because I knew they no longer work well. Wuhan covid is extinct now and we're on an entirely different pandemic now (shhhh, don't tell). And even the new bivalent vaccines they made, those are actually dangerous now, to an extent, because they left the Wuhan mRNA in the vaccines. If the Wuhan mRNA vaccines were your first infection, and the second, and especially the third, and even if they're not, your lifelong immunity to viruses is partially set by something called original antigenic sin. Your first exposure creates an immune memory that follows you and guides your response to future variants. By creating immunity with a vaccine, and then getting another, and another, and another, and another of that SAME initial variant (that no longer exists), you're strengthening/reinforcing that specific immune memory response to that now extinct variant. And while that's good while related viruses are circulating, when Omicron came out, further boosters with Wuhan mRNA actually make you LESS likely to adapt your immune memory to the newer variant (omicron), meaning you can become sicker from the new variant than you would otherwise get without the bivalent booster. And, as it stands, the bivalent boosters have around 5% VE against XBB.1.5, which has recently been dominant.
Due to original antigenic sin, the next vaccine boosters they will offer (possibly in September) will be monovalent and based on XBB.1.5. I may get one of those assuming something vastly different doesn't come along. And it was actually China that released the studies demonstrating OAS with the bivalent mRNA vaccines. So it was suspect of course because....CHYNA!!!!. But the data was clear, they hinder immune adaptation to currently circulating omicron variants. Ok, that's China. Then the WHO recommended any new vaccines be monovalent, and NOT include the Wuhan mRNA. And now we learn the next vaccines from FAUCIPFIZERBILLGATESDEEPSTATE will be monovalent, and XBB.1.5. So you can dismiss the Chinese studies all you want, but they're correct, and have been deemed actionable, even by the CDC, and Pfizer, and the WHO. Without a peep from Pfizer or the CDC, of course.
Now the Chinese study did show, if you only had the original two shots, and a booster of Wuhan mRNA, then got a natural omicron infection, two times, the second time you lose the impact of the OAS and have a ideal immune response to omicron going forward. The benefit of the new BA.1 omicron variant in the bivalent mRNA vaccines was being offset by the presence of the Wuhan mRNA. One of the main reasons the antibodies waned in just 4-6 weeks, and VE dropped so much.
Follow the virus, ignore the talking heads. Again if nothing major changes, Ill probably get an XBB.1.5 monovalent booster, when offered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22718
Joined: 9/27/04
|
TLDR, Chat GPT to the rescue:
2
Jun 30, 2023, 12:54 PM
|
|
The summary of the provided text is as follows: The author discusses the two opposing camps' beliefs about COVID immune damage. One camp blames vaccines for immune damage and other COVID-related issues, while the other camp blames masks and lockdowns for causing "immunity debt." The author shares personal views on taking the vaccine based on available information, and criticizes the continued use of outdated vaccine boosters that may hinder adaptation to new variants. They express willingness to consider a monovalent booster when available, following the evolving nature of the virus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22718
Joined: 9/27/04
|
Even shorter:
Jun 30, 2023, 12:55 PM
|
|
ere are two opposing camps on COVID immune damage: one blames vaccines, the other blames masks and lockdowns. The author took the vaccine based on available information but questions the effectiveness of boosters and highlights the risks of bivalent vaccines. They emphasize following the virus and considering monovalent boosters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22718
Joined: 9/27/04
|
even shorterer
Jun 30, 2023, 12:55 PM
|
|
Two camps disagree on COVID immune damage: vaccines or masks/lockdowns. Author questions boosters, highlights risks, and emphasizes following the virus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22718
Joined: 9/27/04
|
even shortererer
Jun 30, 2023, 12:55 PM
|
|
Camps disagree on COVID damage: vaccines or masks/lockdowns. Boosters questioned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22718
Joined: 9/27/04
|
COVID damage camps disagree. Boosters?***
Jun 30, 2023, 12:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22718
Joined: 9/27/04
|
COVID damage camps disagree.***
Jun 30, 2023, 12:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [97756]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 64886
Joined: 7/13/02
|
Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer - longer.
Jun 30, 2023, 2:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7159]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 9717
Joined: 10/6/21
|
Re: I follow the virus, not the vaccines
1
1
Jun 30, 2023, 8:58 PM
[ in reply to I follow the virus, not the vaccines ] |
|
If COVID itself (the infection, not the vax) damages the immune system which then causes cancer, then the lag variable between infection and the onset of cancer is 2 years.
If COVID vaccine (not the infection, but the vax) damages the immune system, then the lag variable between taking the vax and getting cancer is 2 years.
If both vaccine + COVID itself damage the immune system, then the lag variable looks like one year for both. Rate of COVID infections (purportedly) decline in 2021 and 2022, due to the vaccines. Yet, the overall incidence of cancer increases sharply in 2021 and 2022; this increase must be associated with the vax instead of covid virus, since the vax stopped people from getting severe covid.
(*). The only defense of the vax as not being associated with the increase in cancer rate in 2021 and 2022 would be that the mild cases of covid (which the vax was ‘re-marketed’ as doing) was more damaging to the immune system than the severe cases of covid.
(!!!). For anyone who believes (*) above, please contact me about a sure thing California real estate opportunity. Watts (LA) and Bayview (SF) are exploding as Air B&B investments. I can hook you up for a $1000 non refundable finders fee. PayPal to me at TNet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5694]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 12169
Joined: 9/28/08
|
Biden said
1
Jun 30, 2023, 1:09 PM
|
|
he was going to cure cancer, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [81078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 56152
Joined: 9/13/04
|
A friend of ours got breast cancer
Jun 30, 2023, 2:27 PM
|
|
in 2019.
I guess somehow the vaccine that she never got caused it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19933]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16728
Joined: 11/28/00
|
Re: A friend of ours got breast cancer
1
1
Jul 1, 2023, 9:42 AM
|
|
Might've been exposed to trial runs disseminated through chemtrails while 'they' were ramping up for the 'outbreak of the virus.'
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 50
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
