Your solution is wrong for the same reason that it is wrong for private citizens to vote on every single legislative proposal.

Private citizens simply don’t have the time to individually review and study these legislative proposals because their daily lives are occupied with time consuming activities such as working at their jobs + running their households.

Therefore, people elect representatives to do this ‘review and study of legislative proposals’ for them.

Accordingly, the voters elect politicians who they believe support their views.

With respect to ‘censoring’ of selected topics in the public schools, the people in some states have elected representatives that have the authority to investigate and, if appropriate, remove / disallow material from public school libraries that, in their judgement, should not belong.

Public schools have screamed about what they proclaim to be censorship. B.S. The public schools exist to serve the needs of the citizenry; the citizenry votes into office those representatives that they believe represents their wishes. In other words, the elected representatives are ‘the management,’ the public schools are the ‘employee,’ and the citizenry is the ‘board of directors.’

(*). It is perfectly appropriate … I’d categorize it as an imperative … for our elected representatives to have the power to demand that public schools remove from the public schools those ‘educational’ materials which they don’t believe belong in the public schools.

(*). The citizenry views LGBTQ+ materials in the public schools as undesirable. Thus, the elected representatives should see to it that such materials should be banned from said schools.
(*). The citizenry does not have such overwhelming opposition to the presence of most religious material in the public schools. Thus, the elected representatives should not ban these materials from said schools.