Just ask those 51 current and former intelligence officials.

To TNet’s ‘law and order’ leftists who howl about the ‘illegality’ of Team Trump’s attempt to submit an alternative slate of electors following 2020 election:

The precedent for submitting an alternate slate of electors … in conflict to the certification of the standard slate of electors that reflected that state’s election results … came from when Team JFK (pay attn here, ignorant lefties), the Democrat nominee for POTUS back in 1960, submitted a slate of alternative electors for Hawaii.

Stare decisis (‘the [based on previous cases] decision stands’), still remains as a foundational principle of American law.

But now, that the establishment bureaucracy’s mortal enemy (Trump) had followed this legal precedent, suddenly America’s legal guideline of ‘respecting prior decisions’ … I.e., stare decisis … means nothing.

Therefore, this legally bankrupt but politically motivated attack on Trump moves forward … same as all of the other fraudulent indictments against Trump.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2023/08/04/hawaii-democrats-used-fake-electors-during-the-1960-election-nobody-was-charged-1383765/

Hawaii Democrats used ‘fake electors’ during the 1960 election. Nobody was charged.

Former President Donald Trump is facing charges under Special Counsel Jack Smith’s indictment that Democrats who sent alternate Electoral College certificates in the 1960 presidential election never […]

RememberTheDanny

110%er [7302]

TigerPulse: 96%

Posts: 9837

Joined: 10/6/21

Doxxing defined no need to thank me.

Sep 11, 2023, 10:11 AM

One of your nutjob leftist buddies had accused me of doxxing him. He cited my ability to guess his profession (with his profession being one which is very widespread, funded by the taxpayer and which benefits disproportionately via Democrat funding policies and of which Republican politicians in general and Trump in particular threaten to reduce funding), and then, in TNet exchange in which I had cited the overwhelming tendency of people in his profession to proclaim social outrage over Trump’s policies (Democrat party cliche attack tropes) as cover for their real motive to protect their cushy taxpayer funded jobs, as being doxxing.

So, in a private T-Mail, in which the mods were on copy, he cited my ability to guess his profession (in which he confirmed my guess as being accurate) and then describing him in a single line of a post by his job as being doxxing. BTW, I had also guessed that he was a man, which because he did not object to my use of he / his pronouns, perhaps I had guessed that part wrong and therefore did not cite that part of my ‘doxxing’ attempt as being of concern.

Anyways, after responding to her / his / its message (again, with the mods on copy), she / he / it doubled down about his ‘doxxing’ accusations.

For the benefit of leftists everywhere, below … once again … is a vocabulary lesson. After all, I’m here to help.

The word “doxing” (also spelled "doxxing") is derived from the term “dropping dox,” or “documents.” Doxing is a form of cyberbullying that uses sensitive or secret information, statements, or records for the harassment, exposure, financial harm, or other exploitation of targeted individuals.

This doxing meaning involves taking specific information about someone and then spreading it around the internet or via some other means of getting it out to the public. This practice has been fervent for many years, simply because documents contain permanent records of facts about people and things they have done and said, which can be powerful weapons against them. However, the term “doxing” first gained popularity in the 1990s when hackers began dropping docs on people who had been hiding behind fake names. In this way, hackers could expose other attackers with whom they had been in competition. Removing their anonymity left them exposed to authorities and others trying to track them down.

Doxing has taken a prominent role in modern culture wars, which involve people targeting those who support a cause or hold a belief that is in opposition to one they are trying to push forward.

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Established precedent - submission of alternative electors

It was illegal

Re: It was illegal

Re: It was illegal

For the federal charges, I think you're right.

Re: It was illegal

Re: It was illegal lefties = intellectually useless

My brother. You are consumed by a term you don't understand

Re: My brother. You are consumed by a term you don't understand

Yes, it's doxxing.

Doxxing defined no need to thank me.

So I guess we're both of the opinion that nobody has been

Leftieleftieleftieleftieleftieleftieleftieleftieleftieleftie

LOL***

Re: Established precedent - submission of alternative electors

Re: Established precedent - submission of alternative electors

You dont even understand how the CPI works,

Re: You dont even understand how the CPI works,

Re: Established precedent - submission of alternative electors

Re: Established precedent - submission of alternative electors

TigerBoard POTD