|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1,823
|
Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43509
Joined: 12/12/12
|
TNET: Clemson bracketology: Projections going into Sunday's NCAAs selections
1
Mar 12, 2023, 10:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [46574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13746
Joined: 7/18/12
|
Re: TNET: Clemson bracketology: Projections going into Sunday's NCAAs selections
1
Mar 12, 2023, 10:12 AM
|
|
We should make it but that blow out by Virginia doesn’t help for sure. It be cool to squeak in and make it to te final 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1895]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 648
Joined: 9/25/09
|
Look for the Tigers in as a 12 seed, maybe 11.***
Mar 12, 2023, 1:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [919]
TigerPulse: 43%
Posts: 2275
Joined: 3/19/09
|
Re: Look for the Tigers in as a 12 seed, maybe 11.***
Mar 12, 2023, 3:50 PM
|
|
Impossible to be a 12 seed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4468]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6312
Joined: 10/26/05
|
Hopefully we find a way to sneak in. Let’s see***
1
Mar 12, 2023, 10:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [78]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 76
Joined: 11/30/08
|
Re: Hopefully we find a way to sneak in. Let’s see***
1
Mar 12, 2023, 10:41 AM
|
|
I predict we will be one of the last 4 in and OR #1 seed in the NIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48380]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14948
Joined: 11/7/20
|
Re: Hopefully we find a way to sneak in. Let’s see***
Mar 12, 2023, 12:07 PM
|
|
Definitely would be 1 seed nit. Not knowing what the committee does on wins and losses, it's not, nor could it be, like football. In football you have a limited pool of participants so imo, a committee can look at teams that beat each other and had common opponents etc.
Impossible, imo, to do that in baseball or basketball with 350 teams. Saying, who you lost to, or who Pitt lost to etc would be close to impossible for a committee to discuss. And from reading what the bracket predictors write, it's more the algorithm such as +4 for q1, +3 for q2, -3 for q3 loss, -4 for q4 loss etc etc. And that's kinda what the Net rank does.
Once you plug that in, NC St and Pitt beat us. Not saying that's right, just saying you have to have something like that. Then if 2 teams are equal, then the head to head may come into play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [32656]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14904
Joined: 6/29/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11487]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 13638
Joined: 10/27/04
|
Re: Making the play-in games is not in the tourney. Win that
Mar 12, 2023, 12:31 PM
|
|
This is wide across the board folks... see link
http://www.bracketmatrix.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6281]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12983
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: Making the play-in games is not in the tourney. Win that
Mar 12, 2023, 2:14 PM
|
|
I say it nc st is in over us that we start a riot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13549]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8952
Joined: 8/30/18
|
Re: Making the play-in games is not in the tourney. Win that
Mar 12, 2023, 5:34 PM
|
|
Better go ahead and put your riot gear on...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4276]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5460
Joined: 2/20/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1716]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1782
Joined: 1/24/09
|
Re: TNET: Clemson bracketology: Projections going into Sunday's NCAAs selections
1
Mar 12, 2023, 1:52 PM
|
|
Clemson hurt themselves a long time ago with the loses against the Quad 4 teams (via poor coaching). So Clemson has no one to blame but themselves. It is unfortunate but if they have to settle for a NIT bid that is not acceptable to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1,823
|
|
|
50
