|
Replies: 21
| visibility 1
|
Recruit [93]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 121
Joined: 4/23/04
|
On Sides Kick ?
Dec 1, 2014, 3:21 PM
|
|
Will someone please explain the on-sides kick that was ruled as no good. I thought it was perfectly executed...went more that 15 yards and was caught in mid-air. what was the reason it was dis-allowed ? other than they had to be SEC referees.
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [96873]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29215
Joined: 9/14/05
|
Ball never touched the ground and we didn't allow their guy
Dec 1, 2014, 3:24 PM
|
|
a chance to catch the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2481]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 9264
Joined: 8/16/99
|
Follow up...
Dec 1, 2014, 3:47 PM
|
|
looks like there are other responses, but yes, you are correct.
Any ball kicked off the tee, must hit the ground first before the KO team may recover it.
(with out the other team touching it)
If the ball goes straight into the air, the opposing team must be given the chance to
fair catch it.
Sucks I know.
#21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [81925]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 47121
Joined: 3/18/07
|
The ball DID hit the ground.
Dec 1, 2014, 3:56 PM
|
|
Pinion kicked down on it, top of the football rolled over and hit the ground, thus popping up in that spin.
Only way the football could have a forward spin and the arc it did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14478]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 22921
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: The ball DID hit the ground.
Dec 1, 2014, 3:57 PM
|
|
better check the replay on that one
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 28685
Joined: 8/17/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30841]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 34504
Joined: 6/22/03
|
if it doesn't hit the ground 1st you have to give
Dec 1, 2014, 3:25 PM
|
|
The receiving team room to cAtch it.
Dunno. .I saw the same play, I think it was the gt uga game. .. and it was called the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1512]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 3475
Joined: 7/4/13
|
Re: On Sides Kick ?
Dec 1, 2014, 3:25 PM
|
|
Here's where I get confused. We catch the on sides kick after it's gone 10 yards and you often see the punt team's player run under a punt and catch it BEFORE the receiver team has a chance to catch it, run with it. Seems like a rule change is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [1051]
TigerPulse: 31%
Posts: 3302
Joined: 6/10/12
|
Re: On Sides Kick ?
Dec 1, 2014, 3:29 PM
|
|
the coot player called for a fair catch by waving his arm, thus making him have to have the opportunity to make a catch just like a punt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 28685
Joined: 8/17/05
|
false
Dec 1, 2014, 3:29 PM
|
|
no fair catch called and that wasn't evenly remotely part of the explanation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15817]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7696
Joined: 11/30/98
|
WOW...just make it up as you go along...not even
Dec 1, 2014, 3:36 PM
[ in reply to Re: On Sides Kick ? ] |
|
remotely what happened
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [622]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 425
Joined: 11/6/14
|
Re: On Sides Kick ?
Dec 1, 2014, 3:28 PM
|
|
The kick must hit the ground, in addition to travel 10 yards to give the kicking team possession of the ball if they can recover the kick. That is why onside kicks are kicked straight into the ground.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6592]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 8159
Joined: 1/2/00
|
said it never hit the ground and Coots called fair catch
Dec 1, 2014, 3:29 PM
|
|
meaning you cant interfere with the catch. My one question is with it being a live ball, even with the fair catch, if we touch the ball first before making contact with the receiver should that not have negated the fair catch. For example, on passes if the ball is tipped or the defender deflects the ball first then you cant have pass interference for contact after the ball has been touched.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 28685
Joined: 8/17/05
|
i don't think there was a fair catch call
Dec 1, 2014, 3:30 PM
|
|
if he doesn't hit the ground, you have to give them a chance to catch it
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6592]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 8159
Joined: 1/2/00
|
even if no fair catch is it not a live ball
Dec 1, 2014, 3:34 PM
|
|
I can understand a penalty if you make contact with the receiver first and impede the catch, but it looked to me as if we caught the ball before contact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 28685
Joined: 8/17/05
|
if the ball doesn't hit the ground, the receiving team gets
Dec 1, 2014, 3:40 PM
|
|
chance to catch it unimpeded...
that was the call... had it bounced high, no call...
I've seen that called once before on a high pooch that the kicking team ran under and caught with no kick returner nearby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6592]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 8159
Joined: 1/2/00
|
thanks for info***
Dec 1, 2014, 3:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6592]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 8159
Joined: 1/2/00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3977]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4990
Joined: 8/9/12
|
Re: On Sides Kick ?
Dec 1, 2014, 3:30 PM
|
|
I was just really surprised that a coot player that doesn't return kicks had the presence of mind to call a fair catch in that situation. If he doesn't, its fair game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 28685
Joined: 8/17/05
|
where are you guys seeing a fair catch was called?
Dec 1, 2014, 3:32 PM
|
|
that's not why there was a penalty
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5121]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5299
Joined: 7/18/02
|
You're right, that's not what was called. However, when
Dec 1, 2014, 3:36 PM
|
|
I watched the replay, it does look like he called a fair catch...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [907]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1470
Joined: 10/19/13
|
Re: On Sides Kick ?
Dec 1, 2014, 3:46 PM
|
|
Regardless Kearse made a helluva play on the ball. Amazing ball skills. And ballsy play call by Dabo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
