|
Replies: 26
| visibility 451
|
All-TigerNet [12010]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10572
Joined: 9/19/01
|
131%
5
5
Dec 9, 2023, 8:46 AM
|
|
Washington, DC, has been forced to remove more than 65,000 outdated registrations from its voter rolls after Judicial Watch, the watchdog organization, threatened legal action.
On Friday, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton announced D.C. officials have removed 65,544 outdated registrations from the district’s voter rolls with plans to remove another nearly 38,000 registrations.
Likewise, D.C. officials have identified an additional 73,522 voter registrations as being “inactive” and thus eligible for removal. District officials admitted they had violated the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
“Dirty voter rolls increase the potential for voter fraud,” Fitton said in a statement:
As Washington, DC’s, quick cleanup of tens of thousands of names in response to Judicial Watch shows, there are potentially hundreds of thousands of names on the voter rolls that should be removed by California and Illinois. Indeed, Judicial Watch litigation resulted in the removal of four million names from voter rolls in various states recently. [Emphasis added]
D.C.’s removal of outdated voter registrations comes after Judicial Watch sent notice letters to district officials, as well as officials in California and Illinois. The letters notified them that they had violated provisions of the NVRA.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/12/08/dc-voter-rolls-65k-removed-judicial-watch/
At the time the notice letters were sent, according to Judicial Watch, D.C. reported removing zero voter registrations in the two years prior for voters who failed to confirm their addresses and voters who failed to vote in two consecutive general federal elections.
According to Judicial Watch, D.C.’s total registration rate — which is its total number of voter registrations divided by the most recent United States Census estimates of its citizen voting-age population — exceeded 131 percent.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2032]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3105
Joined: 7/30/04
|
Re: 131%
2
Dec 9, 2023, 8:49 AM
|
|
But don't worry, there's no cheating going on. Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4024]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8087
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: 131%
Dec 9, 2023, 11:00 AM
|
|
Where's the evidence of cheating? This doesn't show that. Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2032]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3105
Joined: 7/30/04
|
Re: 131%
1
Dec 9, 2023, 6:47 PM
|
|
Let's walk through this for the 3 yr old.
There's more registered voters than eligible voters.
They know this but have to be sued to delete people off the list.
Can you follow this? A monkey could
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4024]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8087
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: 131%
Dec 9, 2023, 9:05 PM
|
|
How many of the purged voters actually voted in the last election? Waiting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [42418]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 38464
Joined: 11/30/98
|
That still doesn't prove cheating
Dec 11, 2023, 7:41 AM
[ in reply to Re: 131% ] |
|
Some of you kids are so painfully bad at logic...
It proves that the voter registrations needed updating. That's it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2032]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3105
Joined: 7/30/04
|
Re: That still doesn't prove cheating
Dec 11, 2023, 12:41 PM
|
|
103,000...............
Why do they have to be made to purge the list - Isn't that their job
It's not like they were off 2-3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3615]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 8864
Joined: 5/16/22
|
Re: 131%
Dec 11, 2023, 7:54 AM
[ in reply to Re: 131% ] |
|
Youre so lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1013]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1461
Joined: 11/15/23
|
Re: 131%
Dec 10, 2023, 10:21 AM
[ in reply to Re: 131% ] |
|
lol you don’t care about cheating. Your boy tried to topple the whole thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5712]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 12195
Joined: 9/28/08
|
Re: 131%
2
Dec 9, 2023, 9:56 AM
|
|
Phones of the leftists will tell them that MAGAts are illegally tampering with the election. That is all they will know about this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10990]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15140
Joined: 8/6/10
|
there are countless stories like this, but NPCs will still say
Dec 9, 2023, 11:02 AM
|
|
"there's no evidence"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4024]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8087
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: there are countless stories like this, but NPCs will still say
1
Dec 9, 2023, 12:03 PM
|
|
How many of those that were purged voted in the last election. You don't know, do you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20560]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11708
Joined: 10/15/02
|
Re: there are countless stories like this, but NPCs will still say
Dec 9, 2023, 12:38 PM
|
|
They were almost all purged because they were inactive. So not many.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4024]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8087
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: there are countless stories like this, but NPCs will still say
Dec 9, 2023, 1:42 PM
|
|
I LOL'd when I read that. Murph doesn't read his own links. LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2032]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 3105
Joined: 7/30/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3537]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 4261
Joined: 12/5/06
|
Re: 131%
Dec 9, 2023, 11:31 AM
|
|
Good ol Tom Fitton (aka co-conspirator #1)…now there’s a guy we can trust to do things for all the right reasons…right?
I guess for this to be a big deal, you’d also have to prove that any of the registrations purged from the roles were actually used nefariously and to any material extent in the 2020 (or other) election…or is it just something we are just supposed to take on faith?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12010]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10572
Joined: 9/19/01
|
Nobody has to prove anything
1
Dec 10, 2023, 10:45 AM
|
|
The facts themselves illustrate that these cities don't want to follow the law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3537]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 4261
Joined: 12/5/06
|
Re: Nobody has to prove anything
Dec 10, 2023, 7:33 PM
|
|
Or…I don’t know…they have limited resources and choose to prioritize things that actually matter.
Judicial Watch is the perfect organization for HOA presidents who want to take their Karen-ness to a whole new level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13258]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14282
Joined: 11/2/15
|
Here is the way it works.
4
Dec 9, 2023, 1:01 PM
|
|
As long as the person on the ballot (that is in the drop box or in the box under the table) is on the voter rolls, the ballot is processed. No signature verification?, no ID?, no problem.
This is why Dems want so badly to auto register everyone in their state, and mail out ballots to everyone (whether they request one or not) and have zero limits on harvesting, and drop boxes. Pre-fill out ballots for everyone that wasn’t purged (that needed to be) and process those in the middle of the night if needed. Also, guess what, if a duplicate ballot is processed; the second one is just not tallied in most states.
That is why TNet libs act stupid when you say cheating, cause they think it has to do with space lasers hacking the machines. On paper all the ballots look legit, and this is the game the GOP better start playing if they ever want to win again. It only took 44k votes to give obrandon the election.
I have personally foiled several attempts at cheating in Charleston; so when you idiots on here say “there is no cheating” “most secure election ever”, you are welcome to come call me a liar to my face. Will be at “Hank’s” later if you wish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [328]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 699
Joined: 8/3/23
|
I wish someone would mail me a ballot. Would be much
Dec 9, 2023, 9:17 PM
|
|
easier to vote. Since I live in a purple state, you would think those pesky Dems would have mailed me one at some point, but alas it’s never happened.
They’ve also never voted for me. But I’m sure it’s rampant, and I’m just the outlier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10990]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15140
Joined: 8/6/10
|
How do you know they didnt vote for you?***
1
Dec 9, 2023, 10:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7266]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9496
Joined: 12/18/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4024]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8087
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: HTH
Dec 10, 2023, 7:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7266]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9496
Joined: 12/18/13
|
This will flip DC red for sure.
Dec 9, 2023, 8:10 PM
|
|
Kinda giving the game away by worrying the people who aren't voting are voting illegally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [31938]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 37222
Joined: 11/22/03
|
How many on the removal list voted in the...
Dec 11, 2023, 7:07 AM
|
|
last election and shouldn't have?
Don't get me wrong, I think keeping the voter records clean is important, but it seems many see it as an automatic indicator of fraud and I haven't seen evidence of that. Also, many that claim that seem to automatically assume the fraud would all be carried out by the "other side"....which also seems naive to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9690]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11440
Joined: 9/10/99
|
Yeah - that information would be easy to find for someone with time***
Dec 11, 2023, 8:58 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [356]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 343
Joined: 6/27/10
|
Re: 131%
Dec 11, 2023, 9:16 AM
|
|
You know they say that all men are created equal, but you look at me and you look at Samoa Joe and you can see that statement is not true. See, normally if you go one on one with another wrestler, you got a 50/50 chance of winning. But I'm a genetic freak and I'm not normal! So you got a 25%, AT BEST, at beat me. Then you add Kurt Angle to the mix, your chances of winning drastic go down. See the 3 way at Sacrifice, you got a 33 1/3 chance of winning, but I, I got a 66 and 2/3 chance of winning, because Kurt Angle KNOWS he can't beat me and he's not even gonna try!
So Samoa Joe, you take your 33 1/3 chance, minus my 25% chance and you got an 8 1/3 chance of winning at Sacrifice. But then you take my 75% chance of winning, if we was to go one on one, and then add 66 2/3 per cents, I got 141 2/3 chance of winning at Sacrifice. See Joe, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you at Sacrifice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 26
| visibility 451
|
|
|
50
