Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Can anyone who watched the USC-Ute game
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 6
| visibility 1

Can anyone who watched the USC-Ute game


Oct 16, 2022, 12:07 AM

Explain why they added time to the clock at the end instead of taking it away on that long interception return that got called back? It seemed pretty obvious that whatever sort of inadvertent clock stoppage could have been worked out in a replay. In reality it gave USC at least one additional play.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Can anyone who watched the USC-Ute game


Oct 16, 2022, 12:37 AM

Defensive penalty so the play is "over" at that point. The time taken off of the clock for the interception return wouldn't have happened without the penalty. Therefore, time goes back on the clock. Same thing happened with A&M vs Bama but they didn't put time back on the clock and that missed time was called out afterwards. A&M should have had at least 6 seconds instead of the 3 they were given.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Can anyone who watched the USC-Ute game


Oct 16, 2022, 9:14 AM

There was an inadvertent whistle during the return. The ball is dead so the clock should have stopped.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

But why does an inadvertent whistle favor a specific team?


Oct 16, 2022, 9:20 AM

I didn’t really see the USC offense quit on the play, and it was pretty easy to determine what the clock should have said. In this case, USC got the interception back, got the yardage and the first down, got the clock stopped AND a couple of seconds back as a bonus. Pretty big whistle+ oops.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Yeah, that was a real head scratcher


Oct 16, 2022, 9:16 AM

Sounded like they said someone called a timeout DURING THE INTERCEPTION RETURN.

Seemed to me they maybe should have taken a couple of additional seconds OFF the clock.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


They Must Have Been Using ACC Refs


Oct 16, 2022, 9:28 AM

Only they can make such horrid errors

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It appeared to be a situation which might result in...


Oct 16, 2022, 9:39 AM

the game ending with a defensive penalty which is, by rule, not legal. The confusion was because one ref inadvertently stopped the clock, I assumed that rule caused his to do that.

I think the clock should have run but a 10 second addition to it should have been added after the penalty assessed. That brought about mistake #2, resetting the clock to 13 seconds when the ref had stopped it.

I do not believe it changed the outcome of the game and I'm satisfied with that.

It was unlike the puntrooskie when Bowden was granted a time out he didn't have which allowed him to put his FG team on the field, neither of those clocks should not have been stopped by the refs. Resetting it after the play didn't change the game like that FSU game those years ago.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 6
| visibility 1
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...95 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic