|
Evidently, Greg Swaim tweeted this evening . . .
storage
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
|
Replies: 44
| visibility 3,733
|
Associate AD [816]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 1089
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Evidently, Greg Swaim tweeted this evening . . .
Jun 18, 2012, 9:50 PM
|
|
"Big news concerning realignment on or around July 1st from FSU, ND, and Cardnation I'm told. Not exactly sure what it is, but have a guess"
Yeah, I know we are 1000% committed to the ACC . . .
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1626]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 4771
Joined: 11/15/11
|
Re: Evidently, Greg Swaim tweeted this evening . . .
Jun 18, 2012, 9:53 PM
|
|
Could we be holding out for the greatest offer ever (sec)
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7971]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3543
Joined: 10/18/09
|
He also said
Jun 18, 2012, 9:57 PM
|
|
Greg Swaim ?@GSwaim
"@JustinRyder88: @GSwaim is #Clemson 4th" // Sounds like CU out of the picture.
Greg Swaim ?@GSwaim
"@clemsonsteve: @GSwaim why did #big12 sour on #Clemson ?" // I really don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [816]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 1089
Joined: 11/30/98
|
If, IF, FSU bolts without us . . .
Jun 18, 2012, 10:09 PM
|
|
the football Philistines have laid upon our necks the shackles of ACC bondage with the aid of one William Swinney!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58735]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46470
Joined: 4/23/00
|
Don't worry, FSU is committed to the ACC and has not
Jun 18, 2012, 10:43 PM
|
|
been negotiating with the Big 12. They said so, so relax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58047]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39890
Joined: 11/12/04
|
or just left out since Louisville is so awesome.***
Jun 18, 2012, 9:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [49613]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 30357
Joined: 12/10/98
|
Yep, the blogosphere schism is complete...
Jun 18, 2012, 9:59 PM
|
|
Everyone says FSU is going.
But the Swaiminites are putting a partial ND, Louisville, just about anyone BUT Clemson in the B12.
The Dudians are steadfast that Clemson is going with FSU, that the BB Heads would only be coming if cornered by Top 4 game requirements.
We shall see....
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7971]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3543
Joined: 10/18/09
|
point for Dudians.***
Jun 18, 2012, 10:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5324]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5478
Joined: 9/11/04
|
FSU would be foolish to go without at least one other team
Jun 18, 2012, 10:00 PM
|
|
from the Southeast going with them. I didn't/don't even really like the idea of it being just FSU and Clemson. It would make much more sense to have 4 from the southeast to really make it work well. But hey...what do I know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12579]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 12261
Joined: 11/21/11
|
Agree. I don't know what would be more idiotic, FSU leaving
Jun 5, 2014, 4:07 PM
|
|
without us or us letting them leave without joining them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1210]
TigerPulse: 63%
Posts: 3928
Joined: 5/19/11
|
Re: Evidently, Greg Swaim tweeted this evening . . .
Jun 18, 2012, 10:01 PM
|
|
That sucks....sigh
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1626]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 4771
Joined: 11/15/03
|
Re: Yep, the blogosphere schism is complete...
Jun 18, 2012, 10:01 PM
|
|
Can you imagine if fsu bolts and we stay rpi/sos down the drain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [931]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1349
Joined: 6/23/05
|
Re: Yep, the blogosphere schism is complete...
Jun 18, 2012, 10:05 PM
|
|
What if we stay and FSU goes and the distance kills their recruiting. Do you think we might use this to our recruiting advantage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17979]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8970
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Good grief man - how far do they travel already?
Jun 18, 2014, 3:14 PM
|
|
Stop and think about it for a sec.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12825
Joined: 11/14/09
|
I think FSU has an easier sell with its recruits being in
Jun 18, 2012, 10:19 PM
|
|
the Big XII than we would. They're at the tail end of the ACC spectrum anyway, whereas we're kind of surrounded by both ACC and SEC programs and need to give the impression at least that we're keeping our games a little closer, even though the reality is a little different.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [931]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1349
Joined: 6/23/05
|
Re: Good grief man - how far do they travel already?
Jun 18, 2012, 10:35 PM
[ in reply to Good grief man - how far do they travel already? ] |
|
Why were conferences set up in regions before all this expansion talk? Was that by accident? Why is every sport set up that way professional sports included?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [37]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 80
Joined: 7/1/09
|
Re: Good grief man - how far do they travel already?
Jun 18, 2012, 11:17 PM
|
|
Because BC, Pitt and Syracuse belong in the same conference as Miami and FSU (nevermind having FSU and BC in the same division)? Yeah, it used to be regional in the past, but it isn't any more - and the ACC has the most blame in that shift. We made this bed, now we get to lay in it. It's either travel a lot in the ACC, or travel a lot (plus a little bit more) in the B12.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [931]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1349
Joined: 6/23/05
|
Re: Good grief man - how far do they travel already?
Jun 18, 2012, 11:28 PM
|
|
Has it worked for the ACC? Why will it work for the SEC or the BIG12 I think PAC and BIG are just watching and waiting. No 16 team conferences in near future. So why leave ACC unless our hand is forced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [37]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 80
Joined: 7/1/09
|
Re: Good grief man - how far do they travel already?
Jun 18, 2012, 11:32 PM
|
|
I'm not arguing that point (that we shouldn't leave unless our hand is forced [FSU leaves]). However, I've just never understood the travel argument. You're right that it hasn't worked for the ACC - but if it's not working here, why stay when we could go to another conference where the travel might not work, but at least we make more money?
I'm just stuck believing there's no way FSU is staying, and if they are leaving I don't want to go down with the ACC. In a dream world we'd get ND and some other school to make our conference relevant in football, but that just isn't happening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [931]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1349
Joined: 6/23/05
|
Re: Good grief man - how far do they travel already?
Jun 18, 2012, 11:35 PM
|
|
I honestly don't think FSU leaves. If they do I don't think it is the end for the ACC there is still plenty of money in the ACC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [37]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 80
Joined: 7/1/09
|
Re: Good grief man - how far do they travel already?
Jun 18, 2012, 11:38 PM
|
|
Have you seen the numbers for the ACC TV deal? Because the ACC has been a little too guarded on that contract for me to trust that we'll be "ok" money-wise when we have to compete against SEC and Big12 schools for recruits. Until those numbers come out, no one can say for sure how much money is in the ACC - and the longer the ACC withholds that information, the more likely it is that we actually don't have enough money in this conference to remain competitive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5298]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6287
Joined: 10/9/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12579]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 12261
Joined: 11/21/11
|
FSU going without us will kill our recruiting. Playing them
Jun 19, 2012, 12:04 AM
[ in reply to Re: Yep, the blogosphere schism is complete... ] |
|
is the reason we recruit so well in Florida. They will continue to recruit Fla well because that is their home state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58735]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46470
Joined: 4/23/00
|
Apparently the Big 12 has soured on us - maybe because
Jun 18, 2012, 10:03 PM
|
|
we are 1000% committed to the ACC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23122]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19821
Joined: 1/15/11
|
WELL. he's been 100% right so far.
Jun 18, 2012, 10:05 PM
|
|
I guess it's hard to include CU in his story now. Wonder who takes place in his rumor mill once either FSU or ND comes out and say no in public.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [942]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 2479
Joined: 6/2/11
|
If FSU is leaving, it's because word has leaked out what
Jun 18, 2012, 10:26 PM
|
|
Slive has got for the SEC (read: Florida Gators). If FSU leaves us behind in marginalized ACC, Clemson football will have taken a punch to the stomach. The ACC and Big East will be slightly higher in national respect than Conference USA, maybe. This better not be true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [931]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1349
Joined: 6/23/05
|
Re: If FSU is leaving, it's because word has leaked out what
Jun 18, 2012, 10:38 PM
|
|
What has FSU done lately? What makes you think they will fair any better in a tougher conference? They can't win the ACC you know the conference USA teams that are in it. I would say if we are going on tradition and respect. Miami would have more clout.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [39020]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 51623
Joined: 11/20/04
|
Who gives a #### about FSU?
Jun 19, 2012, 12:24 AM
|
|
We're talking about CLEMSON'S future. Florida State is tangential to the discussion. I don't care if they win the Big XII or flounder for decades, if they leave us in the ACC, Clemson football will be marginalized. The ACC without Florida State is a third-rate football conference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1626]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 4771
Joined: 11/15/11
|
Re: If FSU is leaving, it's because word has leaked out what
Jun 18, 2012, 10:35 PM
|
|
But that would leave us with 13 teams? So how bout ark leaves for the new big 12 we move to the sec mizzu goes to the west. A guy can dream right!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1626]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 4771
Joined: 11/15/11
|
Re: Don't worry, FSU is committed to the ACC and has not
Jun 18, 2012, 10:47 PM
|
|
You believe them?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12825
Joined: 11/14/09
|
If the BCS deal doesn't punish Independents, it's worth a
Jun 18, 2012, 10:53 PM
|
|
look should we start facing a depleting ACC.
We'd have two games annually against SEC teams (H/A) minimum. (2)
Schedule Home/Aways with one team each from Big Ten, Big XII, Pac-12, ACC and Big East (5)
Rotate Home/Aways with Notre Dame and BYU (1)
Schedule two home games annually against Mid-Majors (2) or replace one with an extra Home/Away with a major.
Add the in-state cupcake mandated by law (1)
Add an extra Home/Away from the major conferences (1)
12 games. 4-5 away, 7-8 home annually.
Cut a deal with NBC along the lines of a Notre Dame where they get first choice for either NBC broadcast or NBCSports Channel broadcast for home games (7-8 annually), then either Fox or ESPN for what NBC passes on, preferably ESPN as it allows for greater access (possibly ESPN Gameplan PPV telecasts).
NBC gets additional college football programming out of the deal, and with the cross-section of conferences we'd be hosting they get even greater exposure in those regions that they don't have access to now.
Throw basketball into the Big East and go C-USA or something for other sports.
Bottom line is if there's not a league we're content with, why be in one. With the radical changes ongoing in media and distribution, conditions are far different today than they were when USuC went that route 40 years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [816]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 1089
Joined: 11/17/05
|
I'd take this route over entrusting my future to . . .
|
| |
|
|
50
