Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Science
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 31
| visibility 1

Science


Jan 31, 2021, 3:05 PM

You choose your gender because Science.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Science


Jan 31, 2021, 5:04 PM

Who’s peanus opens up to accept the other peanus ? -Michael Scott

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Easy Soccerkrzy will be mad


Jan 31, 2021, 5:23 PM

about this post and try to get you banned. Easy on the disagreement.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


What a really weird thing to call me out on. I've never


Jan 31, 2021, 6:10 PM

tried to get anyone banned. You okay?

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2011_pickem_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-soccerkrzy.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Cole @ Beach Cole w/ Clemson Hat


Re: Science


Jan 31, 2021, 5:55 PM

Well, actually yeah. Because of scientific advances, it is now possible to choose the gender that you most identify with.

It is not my cup of tea and I surely don't understand it, but how does it harm me if Tom would rather go through life as Thomasina ?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Science


Jan 31, 2021, 6:00 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Science


Feb 1, 2021, 10:06 AM

Yeah, I have some questions about the sports thing, but that is a small part of the overall picture.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The whole issue "is a small part of the overall picture".


Feb 1, 2021, 12:02 PM

Any accountable statistics on the percentile of the population this actually impacts? Edumacate me...

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Are regulations based on science?


Jan 31, 2021, 6:02 PM [ in reply to Re: Science ]

or what feels right.

The constitution gives protection of protected class. I can now choose to be protected. I can choose to compete on government contracts as a minority contractor, if I choose to be in a protected class.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


What is your point here?


Jan 31, 2021, 6:26 PM

Are you saying that trans people shouldn't be afforded legal protections as a protected class? If so, I would encourage you to do just a bit of research about the ways that trans people are discriminated against.

This discussion always seems to trend less in the direction of a debate about gender identity and more towards depicting trans people as being something less than human.

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

My point is that males should not be allowed to compete


Jan 31, 2021, 6:31 PM

with females based on science.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: My point is that males should not be allowed to compete


Jan 31, 2021, 6:43 PM

Compete in what sense, government contracts, athletics?

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Athletics is what the EO was about, hurting


Jan 31, 2021, 7:01 PM

protected classes is an unintended consequence by allowing anyone and everyone to pick and choose their sex. Science.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Athletics is what the EO was about, hurting


Jan 31, 2021, 7:06 PM

So we should not allow people to "choose" their gender? How should we go about making sure that doesn't happen?

Also there's just no coherent logic here. Like are you worried about women's sports? I feel like that has nothing to do with protected classes and the anti-discrimination laws that go along with that designation. It really just seems like you're against the existence of trans people in general.

Message was edited by: Clemson_Chris®


2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

In school sports


Jan 31, 2021, 7:12 PM

boys have competed against boys and girls have competed against girls and we have never had a problem figuring out a persons sex, it's biology.

I don't understand how that is so difficult for you to understand, but it, is I get it. There are a lot of people that have difficulty with Science but we have been able to figure this out for centuries with out any problems ... until recently.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: In school sports


Jan 31, 2021, 7:15 PM

Okay regardless of how you personally feel about trans people and their claims about their own gender, they're out there. I promise you they exist. What should we do about that?

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: In school sports


Jan 31, 2021, 11:01 PM

Do you believe a man who believes he is a woman is really a woman?

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: In school sports


Feb 1, 2021, 12:14 AM

I feel like this question is sometimes used as a distraction from the fact that there are people who, regardless anyone else's opinion about it, identify as a gender different from the one that they were assigned at birth and are living as that new gender. They change their names, bodies, hormones in an effort to align both their own and other's perceptions of themselves with what they identify as their own gender. They're part of a protected class because they experience discriminatory and violent actions across many sectors of society. I don't think we should start going down any path of legislating to people what they can or can't call themselves or changes they can or can't make to their bodies. So if we're not going to do that we have to accept the existence of trans people in our society and try to treat them like we would treat any other person.

But I will answer the question. I do think a man who believes he is a woman is really a woman. I don't think gender can all be summed up with what's between your legs. Your sense of identity isn't something you're born with, it's something that you develop throughout your life. It's based on your experiences, friends, role models and all kinds of other subconscious processing. You weren't born being a man (assuming you are), it's to some extent something you've learned to do throughout your life.

So if someone says they identify more with another gender, how can I tell them they're wrong? It's their personal identity, I can't discredit that. Especially if they have or are in the process of transitioning to live their life as that other gender.

Whatever you think about my answer, I have question as well. Why do you think trans people need to have their own existence proved?

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: In school sports


Feb 1, 2021, 12:45 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: In school sports


Feb 1, 2021, 11:47 AM

Appreciate the nuance, I just have a few things to add in response.

I agree that this could potentially lead to a situation in which cis female athletes are outcompeted by trans female athletes. However, it doesn't seem like this is a looming problem. For nine years the NCAA has allowed transgender athletes to compete on teams consistent with their gender identity with no disruption to women’s collegiate sports. Maybe it's a bigger issue in high school sports, but I think its an overgeneralization to assume that including trans people in women's sports would create some massive competitive imbalance.

I think the bigger issue here is a not really put in perspective. In a 2015 survey of 27,715 transgender people in the US, 22 percent of trans women who were perceived as trans in school were harassed so badly they had to leave school because of it. Another 10 percent were kicked out of school. Excluding trans people from playing sports will likely have a more negative impact on them than any positive impact for the rest of society.

As far as military, police, firemen, etc. I have no issue with any person of any gender participating in these careers, as long as they are able to pass whatever requirements are necessary for the job. Not related to the trans issue really.

I again agree that there could be a potential for abuse in restrooms, but it just doesn't seem to be the case. Plenty of states and cities have had transgender-inclusive nondiscrimination laws regarding public bathrooms for years, and none of them have reported an increase in public safety incidents in restrooms.

The existence of protected classes ensures that "discrimination with jobs or anything like that" doesn't happen. Trans people are protected under the civil rights act of 1964, and I'm definitely not down to get rid of that. Protected classes in the US (sex, race, age, disability, color, creed, national origin, religion, or genetic information) seem kind of important in trying to eliminate discrimination.

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: In school sports


Feb 1, 2021, 12:16 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: In school sports


Feb 1, 2021, 1:02 PM

I get where you're coming from, and I do recognize that trans women may have a competitive advantage over cis women in certain sports. I think the article you linked is pretty informative, and what I got from it is that the scientific debate about the biomechanics of athletic performance is ongoing and not fully understood.

I guess one question this brings to mind for me is, what do we classify as an unfair biological advantage? It seems like in every sport certain competitors are going to have biological advantages over others, and we all accept that. But when the conversation turns to trans participation, that's when it becomes an issue.

This NYT article actually does a pretty good job going over the data and opinions from both sides and does a better job convincing me that trans female athletes maintain a competitive advantage in certain instances over cis female athletes. I kind of agree with Lundberg's position that maybe certain sports should be allowed to set their own guidelines.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/18/sports/transgender-athletes-womens-sports-idaho.html


Thanks for interesting convo, I hope I don't seem like I'm just dismissing your concerns because I can certainly sympathize with your side of the debate.

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: In school sports


Feb 1, 2021, 1:19 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: In school sports


Feb 1, 2021, 12:51 AM [ in reply to Re: In school sports ]

I don't. I think there are people that believe they are all sorts of things. There are people that believe they are a different species. A person can believe they are whatever they want. Just don't ask me to be a part of that delusion.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So are short, old people.


Feb 1, 2021, 10:55 AM [ in reply to What is your point here? ]

Where's my class protections?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So are short, old people.


Feb 1, 2021, 4:00 PM

Just identify as young and tall. Apparently that will make it so :)

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Everyone makes a joke of it. Sure..its ####### hilarious.


Feb 1, 2021, 9:35 PM

but if you think short, old guys aren't discriminated and prejudged, you're an idiot.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Science" is a major part of the new religion,


Feb 1, 2021, 2:07 PM

statism. Unfortunately many people on both sides of the aisle are zealots.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Science" is a major part of the new religion,


Feb 1, 2021, 3:07 PM

From what I've seen, conservatives and right-wing reactionaries tend to be more dismissive of scientific evidence while liberals and leftists tend to believe in it more often (though not always). In my opinion, scientific conclusions are generally a good way to make decisions about how to organize society, with or without the existence of a state. I'd rather have competent technocrats in charge making decisions based more on scientific reasoning than ideologues and demagogues ruling by the power of their rhetoric (which is what we've pretty much always had because that's all the majority of the country pays attention to).

So I'm not sure I see the connection you're making between science and state control, could you explain a bit more?

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Science" is a major part of the new religion,


Feb 1, 2021, 4:00 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Science" is a major part of the new religion,


Feb 1, 2021, 5:05 PM

I agree that the best way to form opinions is to find a middle ground between skepticism and blind trust, but it's a pretty tough balance to reach. I try to inform myself about issues I'm interested in, but I can't kid myself and pretend I understand as much as people who have spent their entire careers studying a certain topic. And of course there's going to be some confirmation bias when I find scientific conclusions that back up what I already believed.

Unless you're trained and willing to go through the methodology of huge numbers of studies trying to pinpoint where some inaccuracy in the data collection occurred, I think it's important to trust the consensus of the scientific community. Provided you haven't spotted some fatal flaw in the research methods, I think scientific research is one of the few ways to look at the world objectively and recognize both what the problems and possible solutions are. Sure there will always be certain studies you can find trying to argue the opposite side, and it's important not to just disregard those just because you don't like their conclusions, but on issues like climate change or mask wearing its pretty easy to see that these positions do not align with the vast majority of the scientific community.

None of this to say that you should blindly trust government officials, because they will almost always be trying to sell you some story about what the information means. I guess the real synthesis in my opinion is not in understanding every aspect of an issue but in determining how to incorporate scientific evidence into your worldview in as objective a way as possible without dismissing certain evidence out of hand.

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

This. I wasn't talking about real science. I was talking


Feb 1, 2021, 5:21 PM [ in reply to Re: "Science" is a major part of the new religion, ]

about "muh science!" as it comes from pop culture and those who worship government.

Message was edited by: CharlestonTom®


2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 31
| visibility 1
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic