|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1012
|
Orange Blooded [4925]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4971
Joined: 1/4/06
|
all this sec talk has me wondering just which teams
Nov 25, 2012, 1:59 PM
|
|
clemson could have beaten in that conference excluding auburn?
i know most everyone on this board is a football junkie and have watched most of those teams play so go ahead and tell me with no sunshine pumping either who could we have out played,out physicaled,just down right beat down in that conference?
not so easy is it?
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [83625]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 63724
Joined: 12/31/06
|
Auburn and Kentucky two worst teams...
Nov 25, 2012, 2:03 PM
|
|
We beat Auburn by 7.
Those two, maybe Mizzou and possibly Vandy, but they are well coached.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1899]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1685
Joined: 6/13/11
|
Re: all this sec talk has me wondering just which teams
Nov 25, 2012, 2:04 PM
|
|
Sort of like, at the start of the season, which top teams could LA-Monroe played competitively?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [881]
TigerPulse: 57%
Posts: 2125
Joined: 2/3/12
|
Re: all this sec talk has me wondering just which teams
Nov 25, 2012, 2:07 PM
|
|
Is it possible that SEC schools would vote to admit Clemson and simultaneously expel USC by a 13-1 vote? I think it would be more like 10-4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [806]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 1661
Joined: 8/27/99
|
In the SEC Clemson would beat:
Nov 25, 2012, 2:10 PM
|
|
Arkansas, Auburn, Missouri, Ole Miss, Tenessee, and Kentucky. Toss up against Mississippi State, and Vanderbilt. Definite loss to Alabama, LSU, Florida, Georgia, Scar, and Texas A&M. Figure this year we would have been 7-5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [362]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 1395
Joined: 6/7/06
|
Good assessment. And we are not close to where we need to be***
Nov 25, 2012, 2:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [4]
TigerPulse: 62%
Posts: 26
Joined: 2/6/12
|
Re: In the SEC Clemson would beat:
Nov 25, 2012, 2:57 PM
[ in reply to In the SEC Clemson would beat: ] |
|
I'm a little more objective so let's try it this way. If Clemson had been in the SEC they would have been in the East Division of the Conference. Oddly, I think you would have done a tad better than you think. You would have beaten Tennessee, Kentucky, and Vanderbilt (you have too much speed not to beat them). You would have lost to Georgia, South Carolina, and possibly Florida. Clemson actually matches up with the Gators better than F.S.U. does. It is again a speed at skill position issue. It would have been a lot closer than you might think and depending upon where you played the game maybe your upset. So lets say at worse you are 3 - 3 in the East. You would have had two games with the West. Usually these are more balanced by strength that since realignment. Maybe you get Alabama and Ole Miss. You go 1 - 1. Your record would have been 8 - 4. With an upset of which you guys are most certainly capable of pulling off you go 9 - 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1799]
TigerPulse: 30%
Posts: 2999
Joined: 4/2/08
|
You guys act like S.C. dominated us. They converted a ton of
Nov 25, 2012, 3:01 PM
[ in reply to In the SEC Clemson would beat: ] |
|
long 3rd downs or we probably win even though we played poorly. They are definitely not an automatic loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5173]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5836
Joined: 8/7/01
|
Considering we lost to them last night they are an auto loss***
Nov 25, 2012, 3:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [362]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 1395
Joined: 6/7/06
|
Lost @ home w so called 6th ranked scoring offense and them
Nov 25, 2012, 4:14 PM
|
|
Without shaw and lattimore......not good
Not just that..... We basically changed what were doing all yr and last for this team as if to say we must adapt to their style of play. No tempo no hurry up, nothing. The thing that was supposed to gas their d was never seen
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1012
|
|
|
50
