|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [3245]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7659
Joined: 9/21/13
|
Since when is it the whole foot?
Nov 5, 2016, 5:06 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4747]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 6973
Joined: 1/24/07
|
Re: Since when is it the whole foot?
Nov 5, 2016, 5:07 PM
|
|
Always unless he taps his toe and then picks it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3245]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7659
Joined: 9/21/13
|
Re: Since when is it the whole foot?
Nov 5, 2016, 5:08 PM
|
|
But dragging the toe out of bounds is ok?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4747]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 6973
Joined: 1/24/07
|
Re: Since when is it the whole foot?
Nov 5, 2016, 5:09 PM
|
|
Yes, because the only part of his foot that touched in bounds was the toe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3245]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7659
Joined: 9/21/13
|
Re: Since when is it the whole foot?
Nov 5, 2016, 5:11 PM
|
|
I've read this five times and don't understand why that's different than what just happened to Cain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4747]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 6973
Joined: 1/24/07
|
Re: Since when is it the whole foot?
Nov 5, 2016, 5:12 PM
|
|
Because a player dragging the toe while going out of bounds has only put one part of his foot on the ground while having possession of the ball.
A player who lands with a toe in bounds and heel out of bounds has part of his body out of bounds while in possession.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3245]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7659
Joined: 9/21/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4747]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 6973
Joined: 1/24/07
|
Re: Since when is it the whole foot?
Nov 5, 2016, 5:14 PM
|
|
No problem. I see where it could be confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [122]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 189
Joined: 2/9/01
|
Re: Since when is it the whole foot?
Nov 5, 2016, 5:20 PM
|
|
Not saying you're wrong either but that has to be the stupidest rule ever. Again, proves the officials don't really know what a catch is even when the whole stadium knows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4747]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 6973
Joined: 1/24/07
|
Re: Since when is it the whole foot?
Nov 5, 2016, 5:36 PM
|
|
Why is it dumb? If half of his foot is in, and half is out, he hasn't established possession in bounds. If he drags his toe, his position has been established in bounds with the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5458]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5200
Joined: 12/3/07
|
Since the creation of football.***
Nov 5, 2016, 5:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1059]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1729
Joined: 11/20/03
|
Re: Since when is it the whole foot?
Nov 5, 2016, 5:07 PM
|
|
At least since the forward pass was legal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [68264]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115624
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Since when is it the whole foot? exactly u can drag you
Nov 5, 2016, 5:08 PM
|
|
going OB. so u can there
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1714]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2492
Joined: 10/14/11
|
Re: Since when is it the whole foot?
Nov 5, 2016, 5:08 PM
|
|
I'm gonna have to agree with you here! I've seen so many "tip-toe" catches, toes in the line with receiver falling out of bounds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5857]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5386
Joined: 9/5/10
|
Re: Since when is it the whole foot?
Nov 5, 2016, 5:22 PM
|
|
TD or not, it still looked cool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1239]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1922
Joined: 10/25/15
|
His toe was touching the ground inside before...
Nov 5, 2016, 5:23 PM
|
|
the heel came down out of bound. If it's ruled a TD, it'd have been at least stand as called.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
