Replies: 71
| visibility 51
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 20, 2016, 9:30 AM
|
|
Not because he doesn't get the players we need, I've been very impressed with his ability to identify, recruit, & develop talent. We have a roster full of good players that allow us to matchup with anyone. He just doesn't put them in the best position to succeed, & when you don't do that you can't reach your ceiling.
I do think he's a good dude that represents the university well & his players seem to like him but...
ROD HALL should have NEVER started at CLEMSON & JORDAN ####### ROPER should have ALWAYS been our starting PG. Especially when you're not innovative like Brownell. Good shooting, scoring & creative PG's can mask a lot of coaching deficiencies because they essentially solve a lot of the problems on the floor that coaches like Brownell can't.
He's just simply not a good coach, & it's very annoying for Clemson fans that have seen us have relative success in recent years.
The blueprint for success at Clemson & other non basketball schools & mid-majors was laid down by Oliver Purnell when he was here, and continued by Shaka Smart & Will Wade at VCU.
When you're not going to be able to get THEE top tier talent from around the country, you have to play a style that is different and annoying to your competition.
Clemson is typically never gonna beat out DUKE, UNC, & UofL for players & most of the time will be behind even the middle of the pack schools as well.
We are a football school, & there's nothing wrong with that.
What we can do is recruit a lot of ATHLETES that are able to play that HAVOC style of basketball that enables us to use our defense, depth, & overall style as a weapon & equalizer against those teams with superior talent. Aggrevation, anxiety, & exhaustion bring superior talent down to your level, and if your not as talented that's your goal, because that's your only way to beat superior talent. YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME ??
If you're playing teams that are going to beat you in a traditional style of play, then you need to do something different that is gonna allow you to bridge the proverbial gap.
Brownell doesn't do that, and he plays right into the hands of teams with superior talent & lets be serious, he also gets outcoached on a regular basis as well.
More Talent + Better Coaching > Less Talent + Average Coaching
Brownell is not innovative & he's not a problem solver that makes ingame adjustments.
He is a decent motivatior, but doing the same #### all the time eventually annoys your players & fans to the point that they just don't care as much, especially at a place like Clemson.
Coach basically relies on attacking the other teams mismatches, getting the other teams good players in foul trouble, and hoping our players shoot lights out. That is a good tactic to have in your toolbelt, but you need a better overall style imo, and then have that type of plan to use as an ambush when you're facing a team with an overwhelming star. It worked against a Duke team that had Brandon Ingram & not a lot of depth, but it doesn't breed continuity and cohesion because it's not a systematic approach to basketball that players can learn and grow into.
Basketball also is a constant eb & flow game, & coach often has a good gamelan of where we need to attack, but time & time again other more talented & more experienced coaches figure out what he's doing, make adjustments, & quite frankly just take him to school. We try to do the same things & our opponents adjust, while other teams figure us out & and we can't adjust. Notre Dame's coach owns Brownell so bad it's painful to watch. & over Brownell's time at Clemson he just hasn't gotten better. He's comfortable coaching a certain way, and when coaches aren't able to recognize their deficiencies and adjust & adapt, IT'S TIME TO GO.
For example:
Dabo Swinney was very involved in the offensive play calling when he first got the head coaching gig at Clemson, and if he continued to micromanage and call a lot of the plays he wouldn't be at Clemson anymore. But Dabo wasn't stubborn, he hired Chad Morris & then Tony Elliot & Jeff Scott. Dabo knows football, and his overall input is very helpful, but he's not an Offensive Coordinator, never will be. It's not his strength & there's nothing wrong with that.
Now Coach Brownell is no Dabo Swinney, but he does know fundamentals & he can spot & develop talent. If you have NBA aspirations, minus PG position, coach will make sure you become a good overall player, but he's just not WIRED to be a master strategist & make snap adjustments. Also, imo he's stubborn, & stubborn = predictable & predictable = NO BUENO.
Coaching basketball & being a O or D coordinator requires a certain way of thinking. You need a certain amount of maniacal intelligence to be able to read your opponents weaknesses & and overwhelming built in competitive desire to stick it people to call the right plays. You have to have the right amout of basketball knowledge, & the right life circumstances that shape you personality so you instinctively flip the ###### on your opponent. Some guys can do it, others can't.
What Brownell needs to do is find an assistant that has these qualities, let that person be in charge of game planning & adjusting, and focus on getting us talent, developing & motivating that talent, holding players accountable, repping the University well, & being more of a CEO than a micromanager.
If he does that imo he CAN succeed, if he does the same ole ####, he will get the same ###### results.
I don't anticipate him changing, because it's been my experience that people LIKE to be COMFORTABLE.
Not everyone has been through what Dabo has and been forced to adjust in life like he has.
I HOPE HE DOES, because I like Brownell, but we shall see.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [76057]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 108991
Joined: 10/26/03
|
Basketball post on the football board on May 20th.
May 20, 2016, 9:33 AM
|
|
Exactly what the world needed.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5513]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 6991
Joined: 4/6/10
|
Hes not a good recruiter
May 20, 2016, 9:33 AM
|
|
See reliance on transfers...
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Hes not a good recruiter
May 20, 2016, 9:38 AM
|
|
Transfers = Recruiting
Welcome to the real world.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Hes not a good recruiter
May 20, 2016, 9:40 AM
|
|
Rod Hall was terrible
Glad you stopped reading, cause you're basketball ignorant.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Hes not a good recruiter
May 20, 2016, 9:47 AM
|
|
Rod Hall had no business playing in the ACC.
Bottom of the barrel.
LOL
Didn't think that would be a critique, but hey, it's Tigernet.
Rolls eyes
Post is SPOT ON, its hard being this smart about basketball in Tiger country...
Just ask Walt Deptula. ??
TD all you want. ??
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7719]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Hes not a good recruiter
May 20, 2016, 10:16 AM
|
|
why are you talking to yourself chicken boy?
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5513]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 6991
Joined: 4/6/10
|
Transfers = bandaid for poor recruiting
May 20, 2016, 9:48 AM
[ in reply to Re: Hes not a good recruiter ] |
|
Clemson needs the 4-5 year Srs to compete with the 1 and done blue chippers at UNC and Duke. 2-3 year transfers will not give us the unity and sr leadership we need. It just proves a lack of recruiting/player development.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Transfers = bandaid for poor recruiting
May 20, 2016, 9:49 AM
|
|
> Clemson needs the 4-5 year Srs to compete with the 1 > and done blue chippers at UNC and Duke. 2-3 year > transfers will not give us the unity and sr > leadership we need. It just proves a lack of > recruiting/player development.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Transfers = bandaid for poor recruiting
May 20, 2016, 9:53 AM
[ in reply to Transfers = bandaid for poor recruiting ] |
|
> Clemson needs the 4-5 year Srs to compete with the 1 > and done blue chippers at UNC and Duke. 2-3 year > transfers will not give us the unity and sr > leadership we need. It just proves a lack of > recruiting/player development.
Square thinking.
You need to field the best team you can.
Recruit the best he talent you can get, if they're not good enough and want to get playing time somewhere else, BYE FELICIA & you go upgrade on the waiver wire while still having a strong nucleus of players that play your style.
Recipe 4 success, and would field a better team than what you're suggesting.
Imo
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Transfers = bandaid for poor recruiting
May 20, 2016, 10:02 AM
|
|
Transfers are a part of game now. If you don't play that game you won't field as hood of a team. Its easier to see how good a kid is once he's played in college, & if you rely solely on high school talent evaluations you're less likely to be correct about a players talents, & you put yourself at a disadvantage against teams that do take transfers because they will upgrade their roster and you won't.
Also, Jordan ROPER will play professional basketball as a POINT GUARD.
Rod Hall should have played PG
The transfer game is a part of college basketball.
You gotta #INGAGE #MAVERICK.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Transfers = bandaid for poor recruiting
May 20, 2016, 10:04 AM
|
|
*Rod Hall shouldn't have played PG, he should have played FOOTBALL
He did give good effort & was a good teammate tho. Just VERY limited.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2481]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 9264
Joined: 8/16/99
|
All kiddin' aside...
May 20, 2016, 9:31 PM
[ in reply to Re: Hes not a good recruiter ] |
|
IMO, with most of "us" having Brad on the hot seat... He does return his most talented team in 2016/17- especially if he can get Jaron to return. No reason....no reasonnnn that shouldn't make the NCAA tourn.
#21
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: All kiddin' aside...
May 20, 2016, 10:35 PM
|
|
I'm with you Prime, we should be good next year.
And AS I SAID, OUR PLAYERS GET BETTER UNDER BRAD BROWNELL.
& it's a good selling point when you can go talk to recruits about how they need to develop.
WE WERE GOOD LAST YEAR, & SHOULDA BEEN IN THE TOURNAMENT!!
But we got worked in the non-conference by some teams we had no business losing to, and it was for the VERY reasons I mentioned. GOT OUTCOACHED all day. Right or wrong Prime Tiger?
I like coach, & my assessment is fair & SPOT ON. He just has to adjust & adapt or he's gonna get the same results and be gone.
He does play the same style as Barnes, he's just not as good of a recruiter as BARNES, and Barnes is a better coach than he is as well. & I don't think Barnes is a great strategist either. Coach Brownell is also more passive that Rick Barnes. Rick Barnes almost got into a fist fight with the one & only Dean Smith. Alpha male & kinda arrogant. Nothing wrong with that, especially at Clemson.
Hopefully playing at home will get us over the hump. Should be a rowdy environment.
But if you want to see a real coach, check out WILL WADE at VANDY. He's gonna work the SEC LIKE IT'S HIS JOB.
That boy is a #### good coach, & imo we should have let Brownell go and went after WADE.
PRIME, just remember when WADE starts to succeed that your boy CAPTIAN STOUDT told you so.
Captain Stoudt
#O
#U
#T
Go Tigers!
?
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: All kiddin' aside...
May 20, 2016, 10:53 PM
|
|
Hal McManus SR BTW
Not his son.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83322]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80233
Joined: 11/29/99
|
Take Rod Hall over Roper any day. Sure, he didn't have as
May 20, 2016, 9:34 AM
|
|
good of deep shot but his penetration talents and ability to stop penetration up top were much better than Roper. That's really the most important two things for a PG.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14434]
TigerPulse: 79%
Posts: 22986
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Take Rod Hall over Roper any day. Sure, he didn't have as
May 20, 2016, 9:36 AM
|
|
THATS WHEN I QUIT READING WHEN HE SAID THAT. PRETTY EARLY I GUESS. LOL
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1052]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 1977
Joined: 7/8/13
|
same***
May 20, 2016, 9:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [97185]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29260
Joined: 9/14/05
|
TL;DR
May 20, 2016, 9:36 AM
|
|
Also, please poast on the correct bored.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [141196]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33976
Joined: 12/5/10
|
TL;DR***
May 20, 2016, 9:36 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3339]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2266
Joined: 1/3/11
|
Long***
May 20, 2016, 9:44 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26365]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20802
Joined: 7/31/07
|
Re: Long***
May 20, 2016, 9:45 AM
|
|
I guess we should have hired Stoudt as coach. Who knew ?
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10521]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7029
Joined: 5/14/01
|
And wrong, in almost every respect
May 20, 2016, 9:46 AM
[ in reply to Long*** ] |
|
This guy is better suited for FGF.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8888
Joined: 10/19/11
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 20, 2016, 9:51 AM
|
|
I stopped reading when you said Jordan Roper should have been our PG.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6516
Joined: 6/1/99
|
So Brownell is like every other coach we've ever had
May 20, 2016, 9:56 AM
|
|
good thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: So Brownell is like every other coach we've ever had
May 20, 2016, 10:06 AM
|
|
> good thread.
Nope.
He's not like Cliff Ellis, Rick Barnes, or Oliver Purnell &...
You're Welcome ??
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6516
Joined: 6/1/99
|
They didn't get it done either
May 20, 2016, 10:32 AM
|
|
Ellis had his run with JUCO fill ins and never sustained anything.
Barnes was the closest we've ever had to sustained success. And he played a style very much like BB. Your argument against BB is stylistic and Barnes has proven that style can work. S
OP was smoke and mirrors with some huge flameouts.
Bill Foster had the best team money could buy and we only had 1 year of success with him.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: They didn't get it done either
May 20, 2016, 10:51 AM
|
|
> Ellis had his run with JUCO fill ins and never > sustained anything.
Cliff Ellis was a GREAT COACH at CLEMSON that had CLEMSON BASKETBALL as a contender by doing exactly what I proposed in regards to transfers. Remember, this is CLEMSON BASKETBALL we're talking about. Thanks for making my point.
> Barnes was the closest we've ever had to sustained > success. And he played a style very much like BB. > Your argument against BB is stylistic and Barnes > es has proven that style can work.
And he had a creative, left handed, scoring PG who could shoot. T-Mac masked his deficiencies as a coach. Just like I was suggesting. He was also on a whole other level as a coach, personality & recruiter. TEXAS AINT COMING TO GET BRAD BROWNELL, I promise you that.
LOL
> OP was smoke and mirrors with some huge flameouts.
OP was great at CLEMSON, & anyone suggesting otherwise is a buffoon. This is CLEMSON BASKETBALL we're talking bout.
> Bill Foster had the best team money could buy and we > only had 1 year of success with him.
Not familiar with Fosters tenure.
And now that you've given your insight I'm glad you disagree, because you are clueless.
A TD from you is a TU in reality. Thanks for playing tho.
LOL ??
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7719]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: They didn't get it done either
May 20, 2016, 11:30 AM
|
|
He is not a donor he cant TD.
We can now add that to the long list of false claims you have made in this thread.
You are an idiot congrats.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6516
Joined: 6/1/99
|
Cliff Ellis = great coach = credibility blown
May 20, 2016, 1:39 PM
[ in reply to Re: They didn't get it done either ] |
|
if you take out the miracle runs in 87 and 90 he is 128-114. In 87 and 90 he hit on JUCO and his 4 year players developed. Otherwise the best season he had was 19-15 and 3 seasons at .500 or below. Again, outside of 87 and 90 he was 36-72 in conference. Even with those 2 10-4 seasons he 56-90 in the ACC. Thats about the definition of "not getting it done." I think 87 was the year we lost to Southwest Blumflub State in Round 1 in Atlanta.
So you opinion of the current situation is pretty much fubar based on your assessment of previous coaches.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Cliff Ellis = great coach = credibility blown
May 20, 2016, 2:07 PM
|
|
IPTAY FAMILY = BLIND & CLUELESS HOMER
I guess Cliff Ellis making Auburn relevant and Coastal Carolina making the tournament for the 1st time in 20 years means nothing.
LOL
I guess Rick Barnes taking TEXAS to the NATTY means he can't coach too.
LOL
& I guess OPP making us relevant only to have Brownell screw it all up means nothing.
The TRUTH is rarely popular, just ask Walt Deptula??...
Y'all just got a LARGE dose of it and can't handle it.
Let it sink it tho, the post is on the MONEY.
Again, YOU'RE WELCOME??
Goooooooooooo Tigerzzzzzzzzzz!
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Cliff Ellis = great coach = credibility blown
May 20, 2016, 2:19 PM
|
|
If Clemson wanted to see what real coach could do with our talent the should have let ! Brownell and hired...
WILL WADE!
That, my friends is a BASKETBALL COACH.
He's going to challenge Calipari, and will OWN Rick Barnes & Frank Matin.
"Don't believe me just WATCH"
But we kept Brownell, and he will do exactly what he's been doing, & get the same results....
#Insanity smdh
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7719]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Cliff Ellis = great coach = credibility blown
May 20, 2016, 2:27 PM
|
|
Insanity is posting the same BS over and over again like you do as if you are fooling anyone when people have already called you out for the #### lover that you are.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6516
Joined: 6/1/99
|
#### son, when you're at the bottom quit digging
May 20, 2016, 3:08 PM
[ in reply to Re: Cliff Ellis = great coach = credibility blown ] |
|
Auburn relevant....HA! He had the same record at Auburn as he had at Clemson and still didn't get jack. Plus, SEC certainly doesn't measure up to the ACC.
Coastal...double Ha. THey play in a crap conference, got an auto bid and won 1 game in the tournament.
Barnes IS a great coach and totally blows your theory of needing to run a hectic style at Clemson totally out of the water. Barnes got slow, clumsy BASKETBALL players to Clemson. He won and won huge. He played the game slower than BB does. Shoot....Tom Freakin Wideman was a solid player in Barnes. Barnes' problem was Ellis' JUCO strategy left him with nothing. He couldn't spread out his recruiting classes so he was 1) going to see a drop off and 2) his wife wanted him out of Clemson.
Keep it up Chicken Boy. I can keep blowing it out of water.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: #### son, when you're at the bottom quit digging
May 20, 2016, 3:30 PM
|
|
No bottom here little man. You are clueless. I'm the sunshine to your dark homer understanding of Clemson Basketball.
You're the kind of Clemson fan Rick Barnes wife made fun of all the time. LOL. Won't give credit to ANYONE & don't know ####. Can't fix stupid, & you as STOOOOOOOOOPID as it gets,
Rick Barnes is WAYYYYYY out of Brownell's league as a coach & recruiter. That's why he was successful. If we had someone that could recruit like him I'd be fine if they played however they wanted.
But Texas & Tennessee ain't coming to get brad Brownell because of all the reasons I said.
You're Welcome for the perspective.
You needed it BAAAAAAAADDDDDDD
Now go listen to Walt's show & try & learn urself a few things turdhead.
Btw, those OPP smoke & mirror coaches Shaka & Will Wade more successful at VCU than they were here, & now coach at VANDY & TEXAS respectively.
We should have got them when we had the chance, they're gonna kill it.
But we got Brownell. Smdh
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7719]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: #### son, when you're at the bottom quit digging
May 20, 2016, 5:43 PM
|
|
Time to take out the chicken trash mods.
This guy is doing nothing but trolling.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4564]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4431
Joined: 7/14/03
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 20, 2016, 10:15 AM
|
|
The "Brownell is an X and O maestro" contingent ain't gonna like this.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7719]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 20, 2016, 10:39 AM
|
|
That mgiht be the most long winded factually incorrect load of bull #### I have ever seen posted on Tnet.
Congrats chicken boy. aka OhSon.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 20, 2016, 10:56 AM
|
|
> That mgiht be the most long winded factually > incorrect load of bull #### I have ever seen posted > on Tnet. > > Congrats chicken boy. aka OhSon.
117, what up playa!!!!!??????
I love makin you smarter on a FRIDAY, well I love making you smarter any day of the week, but especially FRIDAY.
#TGIF
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7719]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 20, 2016, 11:28 AM
|
|
Nothing in that idiotic long winded post made anyone smarter.
You are nothing more than a sad pathetic Chicken troll.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17527]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14405
Joined: 12/14/98
|
Had to TU responding posters that I generally disagree with!***
May 20, 2016, 10:43 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Had to TU responding posters that I generally disagree with!***
May 20, 2016, 10:54 AM
|
|
Good
Loads of insight in the responses. LOOOOOOLLLLLLL....
NOT
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10572]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7143
Joined: 11/11/02
|
You need a job
May 20, 2016, 10:57 AM
|
|
You should get one. It will help you.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: You need a job
May 20, 2016, 11:05 AM
|
|
> You should get one. It will help you.
Hahahahahaha!!!
I'm a Basketball Coach, my Dad was a coach too. LOL. That's one of my jobs at least.
Just figured I'd be charitable and share my wealth of knowledge with y'all today for free.
You're Welcome
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: You need a job
May 20, 2016, 11:08 AM
|
|
IN b4 someone offers no insight and says something dumb about me being a coach.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27445]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 31863
Joined: 8/19/03
|
Where did you develop your coaching skills?
May 20, 2016, 11:19 AM
|
|
Bet it wasn't Clemson!
Coach BB has some real players ready for action this coming season. Even an 'expert' such as you will like this Mitchell kid from Vandy! I personally think that Brad does a great job with the talent that he has available. We did win ten league games this year against some rather good teams. Wonder who coached those games for Brad? Perhaps you were available and I didn't know it. Some coach at Clemson turned Bgame into a rather good player in a short time. Obviously it wasnt anyone on this staff.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7719]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Where did you develop your coaching skills?
May 20, 2016, 11:32 AM
|
|
Captain #### is a sad little gamecock fan.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Where did you develop your coaching skills?
May 20, 2016, 2:41 PM
[ in reply to Where did you develop your coaching skills? ] |
|
CAN YOU READ?
Coach BB has some real players ready for action this > coming season. Even an 'expert' such as you will > like this Mitchell kid from Vandy!
GOOD! I SAID HE WAS A GOOD RECRUITER, EVALUATOR, & DEVELOPER. I EVEN DEFENDED HIS WAYS OF OBTAINING TALENT.
Thanks for proving my point.
Some coach at > Clemson turned Bgame into a rather good player in a > short time. Obviously it wasnt anyone on this staff.
AGAIN, I SAID HE COULD RECRUIT, EVALUATE, & DEVELOPE TALENT. Glad you agree with me.
LOL
Now go give me the TU I deserve boy.
Dreaming of one day getting over that 50% Mark...
Nooooooooootttttttt!!!!!!!
Glad you support my opinion bro. Give yourself a pat on the back. You're awesome like me & Walt Deptula ??
It ain't easy being awesome, but somebody has to do it.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27445]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 31863
Joined: 8/19/03
|
Re: Where did you develop your coaching skills?
May 20, 2016, 8:04 PM
|
|
I read extremely well. I must say that you seem to have trouble with the English language. You have yet to answer my question. Where did you get your knowledge of basketball.? If I was as successful as you are as a coach I would let the world know who I am! You're a chicken right?.???
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Where did you develop your coaching skills?
May 20, 2016, 9:21 PM
|
|
Russ Bergman & Hal McManus actually taught me about basketall. & my Dad as well.
Russ was Pistol Pete's roommate in college, and was coached the one & only Press Maravich at LSU. Swagger for days.
Hal McManus, you can look him up. Upstate legend. Meanest person I've ever known.
No reason to tell you weirdos who I am, my post is spot on.
Full of straight fire insight.
Lmao btw at the guy who discredited all of CLEMSON's successful coaches.
Dumb ### if their ever was one.
Troll with the truth only irritates small minds.
Too much for 117, clash & the minions to handle.
Try and take it in small doses.
? #######
Go Tigers!
PS- Im not going anywhere. What would you ban me for? Being the smartest guy on the board???
No wonder so many people hate Walt, it's hard being this awesome. ??
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27445]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 31863
Joined: 8/19/03
|
Re: Where did you develop your coaching skills?
May 22, 2016, 5:44 PM
|
|
Yep. You're awesome alright. I'd bet millions that you never saw the inside of a Clemson classroom
What was pistol Pete's brothers name?
Never heard of the guys you referred to. And I follow basketball very closely! Did your dad win any games coaching? I never heard of him either.
YOURE AWESOME. A LEGEND IN YOUR OWN MIND,
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Where did you develop your coaching skills?
May 22, 2016, 11:27 PM
|
|
> Yep. You're awesome
THANKS DAWG! I do appreciate it. Like I said, ITS TOUGH BEING THIS AWESOME, but SOMEBODY has to do it.
I'd bet millions that > you never saw the inside of a Clemson classroom
Correct, never went to CLEMSON. BUT Go Tigers!
> What was pistol Pete's brothers name?
Ru Ru Ronnnnnnnnie
> Never heard of the guys you referred to. And I follow > basketball very closely!
They made a movie about one of the guys & the other is one of the WINNINGEST COACHES in SOUTH CAROLINA HIGH SCHOOL HISTORY
Me thinks you don't follow basketball as much as you say. Legend in your own mind it an.
Did your dad win any games > coaching? I never heard of him either.
Not sure how you would have heard of him, I didn't tell you his name. Just a high school basketball coach, if you didn't know the other two guys, not sure why you would know him.
Me thinks you're not very smart & have a small mind. That's why all the knowledge I dropped on you has you so frustrated. Too much 4 u. LoL
> YOURE AWESOME.
Thanks AGAIN DAWG
> Yep. You're awesome
You've made it quite clear that you think I'm AWESOME...I GET IT! Like I said, it's hard being this awesome, just ask Walt Deptula. ?? But I'm ok with it, glad you're a Fan
I'm not Ashton Kutcher, but ForrestTiga thinks I'm awesome.
I agree
Go Tigers!
???
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21466]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12548
Joined: 9/23/06
|
Roper should not have been our point gaurd.
May 20, 2016, 11:29 AM
|
|
He made horrible decision after horrible decision. I stopped reading there because you clearly didnt know what you were talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5513]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 6991
Joined: 4/6/10
|
Had he recruited better
May 20, 2016, 11:38 AM
|
|
Neither one of them would have been an option at PG and there would be no need for this discussion. Recruiting.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8009]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7960
Joined: 6/30/00
|
You nailed it. Recruiting is BB's weak spot.***
May 20, 2016, 2:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13070]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22388
Joined: 4/24/04
|
I only read like the first few paragraphs, but pretty much
May 20, 2016, 11:54 AM
|
|
everything you said is the exact opposite of the truth except for the part about Brownell being a good dude which i would agree with.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28743]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14168
Joined: 6/27/14
|
cocklover***
May 20, 2016, 12:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5887]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4884
Joined: 10/21/07
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 20, 2016, 12:58 PM
|
|
YEAH LETS TALK HOOPES
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13525]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8268
Joined: 3/30/16
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 20, 2016, 2:34 PM
|
|
I
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2892]
TigerPulse: 65%
Posts: 2613
Joined: 6/9/00
|
Great days are ahead
May 21, 2016, 12:14 AM
|
|
BB is going to get it done. He has had nothing to work with as far as facilities and commitment to basketball. It is not oblong, Clemson fans don't care. But he is going to make those who follow just football, spring football, and football recruiting sit up and take notice starting next season. Better get your tickets now. Fewer seats in Littlejohn mean a tougher ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Great days are ahead
May 21, 2016, 1:01 AM
|
|
I hope you're right.
I wish last years team would have started off better, because we had a good team, & I'm interested to see what Brownell would do in the Tournament.
He scouts out other teams weaknesses well, and we def have some strengths we could play to.
If JB improves his 3pt% and will continue to utilize the head fake we will be tough.
I do like our roster & I'm planning on making it to a handful of games.
We shall see.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Great days are ahead
May 21, 2016, 1:04 AM
[ in reply to Great days are ahead ] |
|
I hope you're right.
I wish last years team would have started off better, because we had a good team, & I'm interested to see what Brownell would do in the Tournament.
He scouts out other teams weaknesses well, and we def have some strengths we could play to.
If JB improves & will continue to utilize the head fake we will be tough.
I do like our roster & I'm planning on making it to a handful of games.
We shall see.
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7205]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10169
Joined: 6/27/07
|
You might about trimming that thing down a touch
May 21, 2016, 9:05 PM
|
|
Got about halfwY thru and had to give up. Made some good points tho
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: You might about trimming that thing down a touch
May 21, 2016, 9:12 PM
|
|
Appreciate it EL tigre...
Could you imagine the lame oh's if I came on the board & did a 3 part series on the board? LOL!
????
Brownell's a good basketball guy & teacher. He's just not as good at snap adjustments & his style limits how effective we can be.
He could use a Shaka or Will Wade in his ear imo. & they're out there.
Jmo
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 22, 2016, 5:52 PM
|
|
If it's not blatantly obvious captain snout is a coot fan, this should prove it. Completely stupid post months before basketball season even starts.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 22, 2016, 11:32 PM
|
|
Who YA gonna CALL??????
#FENCEBUSTER$$$$$$$$$
HE AINT AFRAID OF NO GHOST
??????????????????
LOL
CAPTAIN STOUDT
#O
#U
#T
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16250]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26528
Joined: 11/18/03
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 22, 2016, 11:40 PM
|
|
are you retarded?
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 23, 2016, 12:03 AM
|
|
Oh no! CM Shack ATTACK, WITH WEAK SMACK
Solid post bro...
Not!
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 17413
Joined: 8/9/10
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 23, 2016, 8:02 AM
|
|
I did not read the OP too long but your either a 14 yr old girl or have mental problems. All that silly crap you post and talking to yourself and all. But hey it is kinda funny.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 23, 2016, 9:38 AM
|
|
Sounds lije you need a #TaylorSwift kick in the nuts old man
??
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7719]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: Brownell will MOST LIKELY never get it done at CLEMSON
May 23, 2016, 9:48 AM
|
|
I'd put a #HarveyDent your face little softie 117...
Bla Bla Bla
He so obsessed with me.
Its nice having fans
I feel like #Batman
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
Replies: 71
| visibility 51
|
|
|