Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Eric Swalwell testifies: DJT called for peaceful J6 protest
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic
Replies: 39
| visibility 601

Eric Swalwell testifies: DJT called for peaceful J6 protest

3

Oct 30, 2023, 9:38 PM
Reply

FYI, in the Trump / Colorado suit in which CO is attempting to keep Trump off the Colorado ballot for ‘insurrection’ activities, Eric Swalwell was apparently made to testify.

In court and under oath, he reviewed Trump’s speeches and Twitter messages, and chose to admit in court the obvious:

Trump had repeatedly called for the protests on J6 to be peaceful, and to be courteous of the police.

This testimony by Swalwell was in direct contradiction to his innumerable lies about Trump inctung violence. Included in the Swalwell flotilla of lies was his activity in the House Select Committee of J6, in which no witnesses or speakers were sworn in.

(*). Another wheel of the J6 FedSurrection is coming off.

(?). How long will it take for TNet’s lefties to admit that many of the J6 protesters have been illegally incarcerated simply for creating political advantage for the Democrat politicians and the establishment Republican never-Trumpers?

(?). Are the morals of TNet’s lefties so rotten that, in the morality of lefties, it is perfectly OK to incarcerate citizens via illicit convictions and unjustifiably harsh sentences on the basis of denying exculpatory evidence to defense counsel?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Gonna tweet "nobody should rob banks" before I rob a bank***

2
1

Oct 30, 2023, 9:40 PM
Reply



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Eric Swalwell testifies: DJT called for peaceful J6 protest


Oct 30, 2023, 9:41 PM
Reply

Nice try, but no.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Why arent they seeking the death penalty?***

1

Oct 30, 2023, 9:47 PM
Reply



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Two tier justice system probably***


Oct 30, 2023, 9:49 PM
Reply



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Either he tried to overthrow the government or he did nothing at all.

1

Oct 30, 2023, 9:52 PM
Reply

Which is it?

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Either he tried to overthrow the government or he did nothing at all.

2

Oct 30, 2023, 10:21 PM
Reply

Donald absolutely tried to overthrow the government. He started a riot as cover full of mostly useful idiots, lit a match...and under cover of that, the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys went in as they had planned.

They were absolutely going to murder any Congressman they could get their hands on. And that was the plan too. It didn't "get out of hand". Trump just whiffed and Mike Pence stood his ground and the whole thing folded.

Unless you have some other explanation for what Trump's little gnome Roger Stone was doing hanging with the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. Roger is a street-level political fixer who has done the shady stuff forever - as in, literally back to Nixon - and he does not work for free.



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Why isnt he facing a firing squad?

1
2

Oct 30, 2023, 10:25 PM
Reply

P.s. lol @ you saying people were going to “murder” congressmen…you’ve lost it bro.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad?


Oct 30, 2023, 10:37 PM
Reply

That's exactly what the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys are on tape and on text chains saying they were going to do. Which is exactly why so many of them went down for Seditious Conspiracy and are getting 15-20 year sentences.

And hey, there's Roger right there in the middle of them the very day it went down. You know, the guy who got 40 months for being the go-between between Russian intelligence and Julian Assange at WikiLeaks...but who wouldn't roll on Trump and was subsequently pardoned. That dude he's sitting beside on the golf cart pled guilty to Seditious Conspiracy himself.

I'm sure Roger was just a bystander. Even though he's a (highly paid) political fixer who has made a long and incredibly colorful living putting bad people together with politicians up to no good.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


So you are saying (as a lawyer) that those that were

2

Oct 30, 2023, 10:50 PM
Reply

found guilty of seditious conspiracy were attempting murder and not stopping or delaying the execution of law? And you know this because they had texts outlining the plans to murder.

Then on the other hand, Trump is guilty because he said the exact opposite to the crowd but “you know what he really meant for them to do.”

Lol. Wow!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Good imagination.***

2

Oct 30, 2023, 11:07 PM [ in reply to Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad? ]
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Good imagination.***


Nov 1, 2023, 8:22 PM
Reply

Exhibit A of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad?

1

Oct 31, 2023, 6:33 AM [ in reply to Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad? ]
Reply

Have you heard the tapes or read the text chains? Can we see too pretty please?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad?


Oct 31, 2023, 8:57 AM
Reply

There were mountains of court documents about exactly this presented in both trials.

https://www.newsweek.com/proud-boys-intended-kill-mike-pence-nancy-pelosi-fbi-witness-says-1562062

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad?

1

Oct 31, 2023, 9:25 AM
Reply

Wait were those the actual Proud Boys or the FBI/Government assets they placed in the Proud Boys

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So the gov't was trying to overthrow...the gov't.


Oct 31, 2023, 11:51 AM
Reply

And they just tricked those poor proud boys to help.

Right.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

13 Proud Boys minus 8 FBI operatives equals 5 Proud Boy convictions.

1

Oct 31, 2023, 12:26 PM
Reply

Not a chance, right...?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


And they made the proud boys do it, too!


Oct 31, 2023, 4:58 PM
Reply

You would rather believe in a conspiracy fantasy than a realistic truth.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: And they made the proud boys do it, too!


Nov 1, 2023, 8:25 PM
Reply

Where are the indictments Trump for inciting an insurrection?

Here is where the distinction between food and excrement becomes defined.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad?

1

Oct 31, 2023, 9:44 AM [ in reply to Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad? ]
Reply

“An FBI witness”. Ok, fine. We are to believe all FBI witnesses I assume. Just want to make sure we are being consistent here.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad?

3

Oct 31, 2023, 11:17 AM [ in reply to Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad? ]
Reply

The people replying to you are unbelievable. They ask for info. You provide that info. They, right on cue, move the goalposts. Again and again and again. Shameless.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad?


Nov 1, 2023, 8:28 PM
Reply

Where
Are
The
Indictments
For
Insurrection
?
?
?

Answer: There are no indictments against Trump for insurrection because all of the Federal Govt’s prosecutors and all the Federal govt’s judges cannot conjure up an insurrection charge against Trump. Rest assured, they have tried. It just isn’t there. Nothing close to being there.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad?

1

Oct 31, 2023, 9:28 AM [ in reply to Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad? ]
Reply

https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1719174798457131085?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1719174798457131085%7Ctwgr%5E915ad4f02feb203842b5c2ff8cdb48f56c772253%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgreatawakening.win%2Fp%2F17rT6cxNsw%2Flincoln-project-founder-rick-wil%2Fc%2F

This is what calling for murder looks like

Just soooo you know

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad?

1

Oct 31, 2023, 9:51 AM
Reply

Good grief!! Now that is what inciting violence looks like!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Why hasnt Trump been indicted for insurrection?


Nov 1, 2023, 8:21 PM [ in reply to Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad? ]
Reply

He’s been indicted for all other kinds of stuff.

The entire resources of the Federal government and many resources from State governments are on the ‘get Trump’ case; why don’t they indict Trump for insurrection or sedition?

You know the answer, but your pride in a confused belief system will not allow you to acknowledge the answer.

Swalwell’s testimony unravels the entire ‘Trump committed insurrection by encouraging violence on J6’ narrative.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


He's a disinformation specialist... It's his job.***

1

Oct 30, 2023, 11:05 PM [ in reply to Why isnt he facing a firing squad? ]
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad?

1

Oct 31, 2023, 7:33 AM [ in reply to Why isnt he facing a firing squad? ]
Reply

If they were willing to beat police officers with hockey sticks and flag poles, what would they have done to Nancy or Pence?

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why isnt he facing a firing squad?

1
1

Oct 31, 2023, 9:17 AM [ in reply to Why isnt he facing a firing squad? ]
Reply

no shiiit - if that was wanted there were over a million people who could have done that with zero issues.

You need some meds

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"You need some meds"

1

Oct 31, 2023, 11:52 AM
Reply

When teh sick don't even know they are sick.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Commies dont care, they love Stalinism.***

1

Oct 31, 2023, 7:14 AM
Reply



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Stalin would've loved you. He was a fan of liars.***


Oct 31, 2023, 5:05 PM
Reply



2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


Re: Eric Swalwell testifies: DJT called for peaceful J6 protest


Oct 31, 2023, 7:45 AM
Reply

Are the morals of TNet’s lefties so rotten that, in the morality of lefties, it is perfectly OK to incarcerate citizens via illicit convictions and unjustifiably harsh sentences on the basis of denying exculpatory evidence to defense counsel?

Trump's morals are rotten and so are those of anyone who still supports him.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


RTD: What exactly are you claiming here?

1

Oct 31, 2023, 10:10 AM
Reply

Some questions for you because I don't know the first thing about this story.

1) Eric Swalwell was "apparently made to testify"? Was he under duress? Was there a subpoena?

2) He reviewed Trump's tweets? That's not testifying. Do you have a transcript or video or anything?

3) Whatever the real story is, it doesn't sound like the wheels are coming off of anything. Which case will this have an impact on and why?

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


At the risk of derailing an already bad thread

1

Oct 31, 2023, 11:20 AM
Reply

Do you ever wonder how many of these people hoped Jan. 6 would succeed--with Trump reinstalled as president and select people in the Capitol dead--but now scramble to downplay it and give Trump a free pass since it failed?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Re: At the risk of derailing an already bad thread


Oct 31, 2023, 11:25 AM
Reply

I forget if I was on Tnet that day. Would be interesting to look back at the post history.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


Re: At the risk of derailing an already bad thread


Oct 31, 2023, 11:28 AM
Reply

Manac was the only one I can remember cheerleading; many stayed quiet and waited to get wacky with the half ### defenses the next day. I don't think RTD had yet graced us with his presence.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Re: At the risk of derailing an already bad thread


Oct 31, 2023, 11:59 AM
Reply

Just did a quick review and found this:

https://www.tigernet.com/clemson-forum/message/official-list-of-posters-who-supported-storming-the-capitol-28457577

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


Re: At the risk of derailing an already bad thread


Nov 1, 2023, 8:43 PM [ in reply to Re: At the risk of derailing an already bad thread ]
Reply

State of Colorado had called Swalwell as a witness for the prosecution.

The Colorado indictment has no legal standing because there is no basis for their ‘purge from the State of CO ballot / 14th Amendment’ assertion, e.g., Trump incited an insurrection.

Trump has not even been indicted, much less convicted, of insurrection.

State of Colorado, in the practice typical of leftists (including TNet’s leftists) makes up definitions in order to serve their personal / political agendas.

Government and the judiciary in the State of Colorado is packed with leftists. They see political career ascendancy by prosecuting Trump. Facts don’t matter to them. Rather than indict Trump for insurrection (what’s stopping them?), they just call him an insurrectionist despite the lack of legal foundation to do so.

Of course, to America’s Stalinists, laws and words are defined as what they need to be at any given instance, according to what predetermined outcome is desired by the Comintern. Those laws and words are then arbitrarily redefined, according to the whims of the Comintern, to fulfill the objectives of a future case.

Sounds great, doesn’t it?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


About 3 weeks prior to this, I listened to a guy on

1

Oct 31, 2023, 1:53 PM [ in reply to At the risk of derailing an already bad thread ]
Reply

WTMA (local Charleston AM radio) that basically outlined what was going to happen. He didn't name a date, and I'm not sure how he knew the list of events, but he basically spelled out how Trump was trying to start a civil war, insight martial law, and put off the election results indefinitely. In the end, we find out that was his goal all along.

WTMA being the alt right talk station it is, that guy got axed on Dec 31, and some other talking head took his spot. I wish I could remember his name and look to see what his opinions were after being right. The irony was the first time I heard him I thought he was Al Franken, because he sounded a lot like him.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: About 3 weeks prior to this, I listened to a guy on


Nov 1, 2023, 8:47 PM
Reply

Such a compelling argument.

Why, then, has neither the federal govt nor any state government attempted to indict Trump for insurrection? There are endless resources in the federal government to do this. Also, at least according to TNet’s leftists, the govt’s prosecution is brilliant and Trump’s lawyers are stupid. What is keeping the seething govt prosecutors from indicting Trump for insurrection?

You know the answer.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 39
| visibility 601
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic