Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
What was the problem in the secondary against
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 16
| visibility 1,151

What was the problem in the secondary against

1

Jan 5, 2024, 9:55 AM
Reply

Kentucky? Inexperience personnel scheme ?? The secondary tried to give the game away in the second half. No one passes like that on us all year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Having four true freshmen in the secondary.***

4

Jan 5, 2024, 9:57 AM
Reply



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: What was the problem in the secondary against

2

Jan 5, 2024, 9:57 AM
Reply

Eyes in the backfield too long. Same thing happened against Wake last year. It’ll get fixed.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: What was the problem in the secondary against

1

Jan 5, 2024, 11:02 AM
Reply

New guy, Freshman cornerback Shelton Lewis, was getting whipped like Wiggins was whipped at WFU last year. I made a comment here at halftime where I said I don't know how Lewis will turn out, but remember Wiggins WFU game. And then he comes up with the INT to seal the deal. Nice end for the kjid, hope he blossoms like Wiggins did.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Inexperience and being gassed in the second half.***

2

Jan 5, 2024, 9:58 AM
Reply



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Leadership - Missing our on the field Defensive QB Trotter

2

Jan 5, 2024, 10:05 AM
Reply

Trotter was not there to direct where everyone should be and coach the new guys up on the field.

2024 student level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: What was the problem in the secondary against

2

Jan 5, 2024, 10:06 AM
Reply

Inexperienced. Has to be one of the toughest positions on the field especially with a decent QB.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

MEG


Re: What was the problem in the secondary against

3

Jan 5, 2024, 10:06 AM
Reply

Inexperience. BUT---we have a lot of good film these young guys can learn from. And Lewis, in particular, played better as the game went on.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Screw Calford.


Re: What was the problem in the secondary against

2

Jan 5, 2024, 10:35 AM
Reply

Really? Next year try to keep up with our players who declare for the draft or go in the Portal.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: What was the problem in the secondary against

2

Jan 5, 2024, 10:55 AM
Reply

We were missing a starting D lineman, starting middle linebacker, best corner and starting safety. Some drop off would be expected,

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: What was the problem in the secondary against

1

Jan 5, 2024, 11:10 AM
Reply

Too much youth and too little game experience...four plays worth of coverage lapses and one run over offensive PI not called by an idiot ref looking right at the play! They also made a bunch of good plays...they will be fine in the future..it seems clearer now that Wes Goodwin is a great D coach!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: What was the problem in the secondary against

1

Jan 5, 2024, 11:10 AM
Reply

Too much youth and too little game experience...four plays worth of coverage lapses and one run over offensive PI not called by an idiot ref looking right at the play! They also made a bunch of good plays...they will be fine in the future..it seems clearer now that Wes Goodwin is a great D coach!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The fact that you have to ask that question...

2

Jan 5, 2024, 11:12 AM
Reply

tells me all I need to know about your understanding of college football.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-francismarion.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've played multiple sports and would bet any amount that I'm still more athletic than you at this present time...."


Inexperience. With time Lewis is going to be a good one!***

1

Jan 5, 2024, 11:17 AM
Reply



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: What was the problem in the secondary against

1

Jan 5, 2024, 11:26 AM
Reply

Opt outs and less experienced players resulted in defensive lapses and big plays.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: What was the problem in the secondary against


Jan 5, 2024, 11:26 AM
Reply

They couldn’t cover their nose to sneeze. A lot of work and experience needed before our first game next year.

2024 white level membermilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No Wiggins, Jones, Lukas, Makuba, even T. Pride


Jan 5, 2024, 12:21 PM
Reply

The freshman DBs are great…but you have to realize that Lewis and Terrell basically didn’t see the field for over half the season. Barnes had played some, but was behind Makuba much of the year.
Lukas and Pride played in relief of Wiggins & Jones for much of the season.
Plus…there was really not any depth available behind the guys who actually played in the bowl. Pretty sure that they were probably tired in the 4th quarter collectively.
Our best teams had quality depth that was built as lots of guys playing during the season, especially during blowouts (and we have missed that the past couple of years). These freshman kind of got thrown in the fire due to injuries, opt outs, etc….it will benefit them in the long run.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 16
| visibility 1,151
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic