Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Rick Neuheisel
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 3
| visibility 2

Rick Neuheisel


Nov 1, 2016, 1:02 PM

Just read the article from CBS sports . Mr.Neuheisel had some strong arguments and stats to back it up. Well I did some fact checking myself and came up with a few tidbits of my own. Washington's first 8 opponents have a combined record of 25-38.Clemson's first 8 opponents are a combined 40-22. Guess it's difficult running up all those points on such talented teams. Clemson has 3 wins against ranked opponents 2 on the road. Washington has 1 . So obviously the playoff committee would be biased if they ranked a team with more quality wins over a team with less quality wins. Scores are always worth style points. But I'll take a narrow win over a quality opponent any time.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Washington's SOS @ 38, check out #1


Nov 1, 2016, 1:12 PM

https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/ranking/schedule-strength-by-other

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I wouldn't even buy them at 38.***


Nov 1, 2016, 1:14 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Rick Neuheisel


Nov 1, 2016, 1:13 PM

He acts like he thinks they are biased if they put Clemson #3 ahead of Washington. Imagine how he's going to feel when they put us #2 ahead of both Washington and Michigan. He may end up betting the bank on that one. Only to lose everything. Go Tigers.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 3
| visibility 2
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...92 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic