Replies: 12
| visibility 292
|
All-TigerNet [11024]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9048
Joined: 2/22/00
|
Obama's terrorism denial naivte continues....
Apr 17, 2013, 7:42 AM
|
|
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/homeland-security/294187-benghazi-boston-bill-ayers-all-terrorism
Glad I can clear that up for you Mr. President, David Axelrod and Chris Matthews. President Obama's consistent reluctance to call violent acts of terrorism "terrorism" is becoming increasingly more disturbing, with him taking a full day to refer to the Boston bombing as an "act of terror." Yet the consistency of his blatant denial of the truth is becoming less perplexing, as repetition tends to reveal the strategy. His Homeland Security Department has yet to issue any sort of security alert, despite the obvious activity by security personnel in Washington, D.C., New York and elsewhere that may be considered a potential or likely target after yesterday's attack in Boston. After the disgraceful display of political expediency on the part of Obama and his minions after the deadly Benghazi terrorist attacks in Libya just before the presidential election — where it was clear Obama wanted to be able to preserve a talking point claiming there were no terrorist attacks on U.S. interest on his watch — we see the sloppy, not-so-fancy footwork in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings. Leftist sympathizer Matthews on MSNBC attempted to link the Boston terrorist bombing to the Tea Party, as did other Obama cohorts. Obama has been reluctant to admit it was terrorism because he then may actually have to act and be accountable. Obama adviser Axelrod tried to link it to Obama opponents who are angry on Tax Day that Obama raised their taxes. The dangerous and deceitful pattern of denying terrorism, whether foreign or domestic, has its roots in the very roots of the Obama rise from obscurity and a 10-minute political career to the highest post in the nation with literally no achievements to warrant the job. Obama friend, autobiographer and one of a handful of people who helped launch his career at a Chicago fundraiser in his home (by his own admission),is also a terrorist. So you can imagine how awkward this must be for Obama, Axelrod and others to be forthcoming with the American people on when we have been a victim of terrorism. Ayers is a founder of the Weather Underground radical organization in the late 1960s that was responsible for bombings at the New York City police headquarters, a San Francisco police station, the U.S. Capitol, the Pentagon. Obama merely claimed Ayers was someone who engaged in "detestable acts." The president finally called yesterday's bombings "acts of terror." I guess it took him a full day to decide between "acts of terror" and "detestable acts"
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12269]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14009
Joined: 2/19/99
|
Re: Obama's terrorism denial naivte continues....
Apr 17, 2013, 7:53 AM
|
|
...pretty amazing how far we have fallen...
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12066]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 13285
Joined: 1/29/09
|
So we are now better off because he finnally called
Apr 17, 2013, 8:16 AM
|
|
them acts of terror instead of detestable acts? What difference does it make?
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12269]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14009
Joined: 2/19/99
|
Re: So we are now better off because he finnally called
Apr 17, 2013, 8:27 AM
|
|
The PC dancing shows a lack of resolve...., see our false relationship with the Saudies and the refusal to admit the truth about Hassan....this is not unique to Obama but he seems realy bent on appeasement and being PC while he goes nuts with drones.....all bery odd...
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [112517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 74101
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: So we are now better off because he finnally called
Apr 17, 2013, 8:47 AM
|
|
gee, this is just awful stuff. Had he called it off the bat, you would have argued that he jumped to conclusions instead.
Don't let me stop you from being petty, carry on.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83311]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80226
Joined: 11/29/99
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12269]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14009
Joined: 2/19/99
|
Re: I thought you were all for supporting and appeasing our
Apr 17, 2013, 9:45 AM
|
|
It is an unholy alliance born out of necessity. I do not think it should include allowing their little disgruntled bombers to come here and run around blowing our people up and flying planes into buildings.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83311]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80226
Joined: 11/29/99
|
Everyone's against their disgruntled bombers coming here
Apr 17, 2013, 10:23 AM
|
|
and blowing up our people and buildings, right?
Do you think Saudi leadership and Mubarak, etc. are/were in on these types of attacks in any way?
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12269]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14009
Joined: 2/19/99
|
Re: Everyone's against their disgruntled bombers coming here
Apr 17, 2013, 10:43 AM
|
|
The new crew in Egypt could be but generally, no, not at all. I think the reason we allow all the Saudi students is that it keeps pressure off the Royal family. Those fat pigs will hang if they ever lose the military or we back away from them. They pay the population with cash and a society that adheres to strict Wahabi Islam in order to hold power.
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [32958]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 53106
Joined: 3/5/02
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1599]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3020
Joined: 1/30/05
|
I question why Obama made the statement:
Apr 17, 2013, 1:19 PM
|
|
We need to find out who did this, and why.
Why do we need to know why? I would actually prefer that this person's mission statement not be broadcasted but buried, with along with the perp. Is this some window to blame the American people, or justify some sort of change? I'm tired of excuses being made for this type of person.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21652]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 23444
Joined: 8/16/03
|
Ah contemporary American politics...
Apr 17, 2013, 2:22 PM
|
|
A place where entirely meaningless sh** is obsessed over.
Rational independents, point and laugh.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8142]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19775
Joined: 6/6/03
|
ROTFLMAO.
Apr 17, 2013, 3:24 PM
|
|
The day of the bombing, while the rest of the networks were covering the tragedy, FOX spent their time speculating about when the president might use the word "terrorism" - making hay while the sun shined, so to speak. They bring this up often, supposedly to show how soft Obama is on terrorism, the fact that he has pursued terrorists far more aggressively than his predecessor apparently escaping their attention. Just indicative of what's imprtant to them.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 292
|
|
|