|
Replies: 20
| visibility 751
|
Orange Blooded [4697]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2330
Joined: 1/9/07
|
Why is everybody saying we cannot win without Clark?
5
5
Mar 5, 2024, 1:09 PM
|
|
We played our best basketball of the season while he was not with the team. Sounds like somebody else I know, getting their excuse ducks all in a row before they actually need them.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [61846]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39644
Joined: 12/16/01
|
Caitlyn?***
4
Mar 5, 2024, 1:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7535]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4399
Joined: 10/28/17
|
Re: Caitlyn?***
3
Mar 5, 2024, 8:23 AM
|
|
Probably wouldn't have shot 5-28 3pts shots if she was playing against ND.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7535]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4399
Joined: 10/28/17
|
Re: Why is everybody saying we cannot win without Clark?
2
Dec 6, 2023, 1:14 PM
|
|
I was going to aak the same. We played the first third of the season without Clark and beat Bama, Boise, TCU and others without him. Why did we lose to last place ACC team just because he was on the bench sick? Surely Beadle, Godfrey, Wiggins, Hunter should be good enough with the remaining cast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4697]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2330
Joined: 1/9/07
|
Re: Why is everybody saying we cannot win without Clark?
Mar 5, 2024, 1:45 PM
|
|
Beadle? His minutes have increased the last half of the season and as a result the offense comes to a screeching halt when he and Baby Hunter go in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64591]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
In fairness, Beadle is a terrible ball handler and a turnover machine.***
Mar 5, 2024, 1:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [361]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 397
Joined: 1/21/09
|
Re: In fairness, Beadle is a terrible ball handler and a turnover machine.***
1
Mar 5, 2024, 3:17 PM
|
|
has made some surprising turnovers, but usually one of our most dynamic ball handlers/drivers/passers - not too convinced of his outside shot - should use glass much more as pull up after initially beating his man (left handers already tough to guard and different angles would be advantageous in getting off shot and likely drawing more fouls) - actually think he could be a difference maker if gets more playing time (so we will probably see little of him from here out ) - do think it best he and D Hunter not out there together though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64591]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
He often seems out of control...
Mar 5, 2024, 3:54 PM
|
|
which leads to so many of his turnovers. This should improve with experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [460]
TigerPulse: 79%
Posts: 924
Joined: 10/29/05
|
Re: Why is everybody saying we cannot win without Clark?
2
Mar 5, 2024, 1:46 PM
[ in reply to Re: Why is everybody saying we cannot win without Clark? ] |
|
That's not even true. He had 8 points a couple games ago in a critical moment at end of game. The guy is shifty. Makes some mistakes sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64591]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
This is where the Cult members point to...
1
Mar 5, 2024, 1:45 PM
[ in reply to Re: Why is everybody saying we cannot win without Clark? ] |
|
injuries and a lack of depth off the bench.
Of course, attempting 28 threes instead of exploiting the mismatch Clemson had inside against ND by feeding the post and to open up the jumpers instead of the other way around, had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with injuries or an inability to practice and everything to do with coaching or the lack thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44054]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 32967
Joined: 2/22/03
|
Injuries have impacted our depth.
1
2
Mar 5, 2024, 2:11 PM
|
|
No one has blamed this as a sole reason for our losses, as each game we can point to other errors and miscues.
Acting like injuries haven't impacted our season is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64591]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Of course it does as is the case in all sports...
Mar 5, 2024, 2:32 PM
|
|
What I said was the loss this past Saturday had nothing to do with injuries or depth and everything to do with pi$$ poor coaching. CBB simply failed to exploit a clear strength/advantage and instead just allowed the team jack up 28 three pointers, 10 of which were from the friggin' starting Center.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44054]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 32967
Joined: 2/22/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [65528]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33280
Joined: 12/3/03
|
Enough to see that this team has enough talent to ovecome Brad Brownell's lack
1
Mar 5, 2024, 3:05 PM
|
|
of coaching more than most of his past teams. But, on nights like the other night against Notre Dame, a coach with a clue would have gotten us a win. Even normally clueless announcers could not understand why we were not feeding Schieff or Hall every time down the floor, it was there for the taking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44054]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 32967
Joined: 2/22/03
|
Re: Enough to see that this team has enough talent to ovecome Brad Brownell's lack
2
Mar 5, 2024, 3:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64591]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2482]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 1329
Joined: 2/20/24
|
Re: Why is everybody saying we cannot win without Clark?
3
Mar 5, 2024, 1:41 PM
|
|
He plays great D and we need depth on this team this late in the season. Some guys are banged up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1749]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 1531
Joined: 11/27/22
|
Re: Why is everybody saying we cannot win without Clark?
Mar 5, 2024, 1:53 PM
|
|
Oh he's not playing tonight?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44054]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 32967
Joined: 2/22/03
|
We have only lost 1 game this year when he starts.
1
2
Mar 5, 2024, 1:58 PM
|
|
We are good without him, but absolutely better with him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1655]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1824
Joined: 12/9/15
|
Re: Why is everybody saying we cannot win without Clark?
Mar 5, 2024, 2:27 PM
|
|
Because this is a football board....
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8538]
TigerPulse: 48%
Posts: 11514
Joined: 9/9/06
|
Re: Why is everybody saying we cannot win without Clark?
1
2
Mar 5, 2024, 2:47 PM
|
|
Look at the ACC record with and without Clark.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 20
| visibility 751
|
|
|
50
