Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Any law talking guys here? Fox lawsuit
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 23
| visibility 1

Any law talking guys here? Fox lawsuit

1

Mar 31, 2023, 5:27 PM

Dominion won part of their case in summary and the rest is going to trial. Correct me if I'm wrong, but winning a defamation suit in summary is pretty unheard of.

https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1641892115549396992?t=QSkDnoyt2Dwedw98Upegrg&s=19

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Any law talking guys here? Fox lawsuit

1

Mar 31, 2023, 5:40 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

On that we agree.

1

Mar 31, 2023, 6:22 PM

I get that malice is harder to prove, though I can't imagine a really good excuse for saying Hugo Chavez has risen from the dead and manipulating voting machines through telekinesis or whatever. Looks like there's also some legal talk about who was involved in the decision to broadcast all these false statements. Given how openly the anchors and producers were talking about how it was all BS, don't imagine there's a good defense there either.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On that we agree.


Mar 31, 2023, 6:33 PM

That "no reasonable person would believe that what we said was true" defense doesn't, intuitively, seem like a solid defense in this lawsuit. Fox arguably did an enormous amount of damage to the company with the lies.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Yes they were devastated

1

Mar 31, 2023, 6:39 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I really enjoy the part about the pillow guy


Mar 31, 2023, 6:53 PM

How in their self-sustaining ecosystem, they have to keep airing him so he can sell more pillows so he can buy more ads.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Any law talking guys here? Fox lawsuit

1

Mar 31, 2023, 6:39 PM [ in reply to Re: Any law talking guys here? Fox lawsuit ]

LOL, Phox is phucked!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwmuSMudmv4

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ohhhhhhhhhhhh Rrrrrrrrrockkky***


Mar 31, 2023, 7:33 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Dominion vs Fox News: Overview of Summary Judgement


Mar 31, 2023, 6:01 PM

Not a lawyer here … sharing some basics (via FindLaw website) about Summary Judgement:

When one party believes that there are no important facts in dispute, he will file a motion for summary judgment. A typical summary judgment motion has three parts. For the purposes of this article, let's assume that the plaintiff filed the motion, and that the defendant must now respond.

Part 1: These are the facts: First, the plaintiff will present a version of the facts. The plaintiff usually attaches photos, signed statements from witnesses, and any other evidence to back up their statements about the facts.

Part 2: This is the law: Next, the plaintiff will argue about the state of the law. The plaintiff's attorney will write up a memorandum that discusses the statutes and cases that govern the parties and attempt to convince the judge that, under the law, the plaintiff is entitled to win the case.

Part 3: Even if…: In the last part of the summary judgment motion, the plaintiff will anticipate what the defendant will argue, and will try to prove that even if the defendant is correct in her arguments, the plaintiff will still win the case.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxx

From what I get out of this, motions for Summary Judgement are a typical tactic for both the prosecution and the defense. I wouldn’t get too worked up either way about it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You didn’t even know what the Brady Rule was, I would


Mar 31, 2023, 7:28 PM

keep your law opinions to yourself.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Here is some coverage...

1

Mar 31, 2023, 6:30 PM

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/judge-deals-fox-defeat-in-dominion-case


2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Judge E.Davis: Dem appt’d by Dem gov in DE (3 decades Dem)


Mar 31, 2023, 7:02 PM

Democrat judge appointed by Democrat governor in a state that has had a Democrat in the Governor’s mansion for 30 consecutive years.

Shocked, shocked I say, that Judge Eric Davis has decided that the First Amendment excuse doesn’t apply to Fox News in their defense of the Dominion suit.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


The election is rigged, the courts are rigged, on the way to

1

Mar 31, 2023, 7:10 PM

a police state. I think we both know what your only chance of fighting this tyranny is Danny ;)

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Danny better get in line... Daddy goin' to work.***


Apr 4, 2023, 12:14 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Judge E.Davis: Dem appt’d by Dem gov in DE (3 decades Dem)

1
1

Mar 31, 2023, 7:39 PM [ in reply to Judge E.Davis: Dem appt’d by Dem gov in DE (3 decades Dem) ]

George Patacki was the Republican Governor of new York from 1995 to 2006.
2023 - 2006 = 17.
dumbazz.

New York has actually been fairly split until the last few years, with the State Senate controlled by the GOP from 1992 to 2018.

But pretend you have a clue.

You get how the dumb redneck states have all gone solid red? That's how states like New York have now gone blue.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Which states are people moving to?


Mar 31, 2023, 7:42 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Which states are people moving to?


Mar 31, 2023, 7:48 PM

Couldn't have one thing to do with an equivalent house costing 1/3 to 1/4 of up there, much less all the other cost of living savings. Not one thing I tell ya! They are not coming for the red, they are coming for the green!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Which states are people moving to?

1

Mar 31, 2023, 8:05 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Which states are people moving to?

1

Mar 31, 2023, 8:13 PM

10:1 deaths amongst the unvaccinated at this point. So, dumnb rednecks, please don't get vaccinated.

I believe Connecticut was #1 in per capita new housing starts last year.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Which states are people moving to?


Mar 31, 2023, 8:16 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Which states are people moving to?


Mar 31, 2023, 8:27 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Taking a brief glance...

1

Apr 3, 2023, 3:21 PM

...it looks like Dominion won as to the element of falsity, which is not their whole case but it's an essential element. The remainder of their proofs will be determined at trial.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


Re: Taking a brief glance...


Apr 3, 2023, 3:38 PM

...and the problem of proving malice - which means, basically, they caused harm and said what they said even knowing what they were saying was false - is actually pretty easy to prove in this case because the Dominion lawyers have texts from inside the Fox News building by guys like Tucker Carlson himself proving that. Rupert Murdoch himself, when pressed on the stand, admitted he knew full well what the truth was but "had" to basically because he was afraid of his audience.

That seems as bad for the defense as anything the plaintiffs had on Alex Jones...and it screams louder than a shout that the plaintiffs had somebody high up inside the Fox building. I mean, when you've got Tucker's private texts and Rupert Murdoch's private e-mails, that's, uhm, large, and I think there's probably a real interesting story there. How on Earth did they even get those? And is being afraid to give your own audience the bad news a real defense?

It's telling Fox isn't even attempting a "we didn't know" defense. Instead their defense seems to be a First Amendment defense. In which case they may have already conceded malice, yes?

I know Tucker was really, really butthurt Dominion got and leaked his texts.

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3911174-tucker-carlson-enraged-private-texts-revealed-i-love-trump/


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Winning a defamation suit at all is very, very difficult.***


Apr 3, 2023, 4:37 PM



2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


Replies: 23
| visibility 1
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic