|
Replies: 10
| visibility 701
|
Letterman [291]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 86
Joined: 1/27/08
|
Tnet Lawyers: If the Acc decided to ..
Mar 27, 2024, 3:43 PM
|
|
Kick Clemson and FSU out the conference while replacing them with team X and Y and Espn decided to continue the current contract with the ACC until 2036. Would the Acc still own the media rights to both Clemson and FSU? Since Clemson and FSU signed the current GOR until 2036.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [229]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 215
Joined: 9/1/23
|
Re: Tnet Lawyers: If the Acc decided to ..
1
Mar 27, 2024, 3:45 PM
|
|
wut?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [291]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 86
Joined: 1/27/08
|
Re: Tnet Lawyers: If the Acc decided to ..
Mar 27, 2024, 3:51 PM
|
|
The Acc could take a vote and kick both Clemson and FSU out.
Replace them with 2 other schools.
ESPN continue the current contract until 2036.
Clemson and FSU who signed their GOR over to the ACC until 2036 would not be in the ACC anymore.
Does Clemson and FSU get their GOR back or would all home games played still be subject to the GOR?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5081]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2558
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Tnet Lawyers: If the Acc decided to ..
Mar 27, 2024, 5:26 PM
|
|
Don't know, but Ga Southern, Ga State, and Furman might be interested in joining. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1045]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 2083
Joined: 4/7/22
|
Re: Tnet Lawyers: If the Acc decided to ..
Mar 27, 2024, 3:46 PM
|
|
No, the ACC would not in the rights in that case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [291]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 86
Joined: 1/27/08
|
Re: Tnet Lawyers: If the Acc decided to ..
Mar 27, 2024, 3:58 PM
|
|
Why not? Is it because Clemson and FSU would NOT be in the ACC anymore?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12943]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6228
Joined: 1/26/16
|
"kicked us out"... no, no they would not... contracts are written to be broken
2
Mar 27, 2024, 3:48 PM
|
|
meaning, any contract is going to have a provision for the self-interest of the parties involved. In this case, that would be Clemson.
For example, if the ACC were to say "we'll show Clemson, we'll just agree to a terrible deal and give the B1G and SEC 80% and we'll take 20%"... then Clemson absolutely has the right to self-preservation, and I think that is how a judge would find.
It is one of the reason's Clemson waited until after the CFP numbers were released, then referenced the in the suit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [291]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 86
Joined: 1/27/08
|
Re: "kicked us out"... no, no they would not... contracts are written to be broken
1
Mar 27, 2024, 3:54 PM
|
|
I agree. I posted as to say just because Clemson signed the GOR contract that everyone says is Ironclad there are obviously some interpretation in these laws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1045]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 2083
Joined: 4/7/22
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12943]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6228
Joined: 1/26/16
|
the CFP revenue.. I know it's higher... but if that were the case
1
Mar 27, 2024, 4:11 PM
|
|
that would be an existential threat to Clemson...
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1858]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1555
Joined: 10/3/19
|
Re: Tnet Lawyers: If the Acc decided to ..
Mar 27, 2024, 5:07 PM
|
|
I'll give you a lawyerly answer to your query - It depends  .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 10
| visibility 701
|
|
|
50
