Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Over rated
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 15
| visibility 1,205

Over rated


Sep 19, 2014, 6:10 AM

Do the people voting for college football actually watch the teams they are voting for? Auburn just like some others in the top are way over rated. If sec is so bad how is it two weak teams from a weak conference come in and do what they have done to the established sec teams(sc since 1992). These teams were playing with the same ones that they had when the sec considered them weak. College football is going to the dumps because of the $.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

K State has 58 walk-ons currently on the team. 2/3 of 85.***


Sep 19, 2014, 6:33 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Yet they held their own with the mighty SEC.***


Sep 19, 2014, 6:38 AM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Should have won...***


Sep 19, 2014, 6:48 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Should have won...***


Sep 19, 2014, 7:28 AM

But they didn't,and the last time I checked there was not a columm for should have's.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Should have won...***


Sep 19, 2014, 7:56 AM

KSU shot both feet off with a shotgun. Should've you say? They should've blown the sec champs out. Dropped td turns in to pick, a butt load of missed fg that if made they win regardless.

KSU left a 30-17 type win out there and I bet it eats them up today.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Still suxing that SEC hype, huh? Nothing like the obvious.***


Sep 19, 2014, 8:01 AM [ in reply to Re: Should have won...*** ]



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Yet they held their own with the mighty SEC.***


Sep 19, 2014, 7:27 AM [ in reply to Yet they held their own with the mighty SEC.*** ]

But did they win?
That would be a big fat "NO".
It's one thing to hold your own,but it's another to win.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: K State has 58 walk-ons currently on the team. 2/3 of 85.***


Sep 19, 2014, 7:09 AM [ in reply to K State has 58 walk-ons currently on the team. 2/3 of 85.*** ]

Link?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Heard it on ESPiN... Pollack was talking about it. Google it***


Sep 19, 2014, 7:10 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: K State has 58 walk-ons currently on the team. 2/3 of 85.***


Sep 19, 2014, 7:12 AM [ in reply to K State has 58 walk-ons currently on the team. 2/3 of 85.*** ]

i'll take that bet. they may have 58 jucos.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

According to ESPiN, 58 current or former "walk-ons"....***


Sep 19, 2014, 7:14 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


By the way, it was discussed on 2 separate shows....***


Sep 19, 2014, 7:15 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


What bet? Link.


Sep 19, 2014, 7:19 AM [ in reply to Re: K State has 58 walk-ons currently on the team. 2/3 of 85.*** ]

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/snyder-history-turning-walk-ons-215606680--spt.html;_ylt=AwrBT9FHEBxU9XwAvEBXNyoA

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Maybe.


Sep 19, 2014, 6:37 AM

I view the playoff as a move to make NCAA football more honest. I'm not saying it's the perfect way but it's better then the previous methods we've had.

I know it's a force of habit for us to view the polls as being influential on selecting teams to compete in the NC game. I hope and believe that they will have very little if any bearing on the selection of those teams with the playoff system.

I'm fully aware of the voting practices of particular entities and that they attempt to place their favorites higher in the polls. I am also aware they place those in competition with their favorites lower in the polls in order to make those favorites appear to be better than the probably are.

I know that the process of biased voting is promoted by each and every ESPiN broadcast. Also, every sports hack get most of his information from the spin machine which I call ESPiN.

We all know the polls straighten out somewhat after eight or ten weeks and from there things look a quite a bit more accurate. The preseason polls still influence and that's what we are sick of seeing.

I expect this to end this year.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Maybe.


Sep 19, 2014, 6:56 AM

Great post 1988.
I do hope the new system works better. I understand the selection committee is required to actually watch games and not just take espin word on who is the best. The ones voting in the polls should be required each week to give their picks and you would see the ones that are just voting for their favorite teams instead of who is better.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 15
| visibility 1,205
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic